Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you feel 5e pressures you to build strong over fun?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7049774" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Yes. The issue was never so much that you couldn't build a seemingly incompetent or non-combatant character, as that doing so would require intentionally 'gimping' it with very bad choices, or flat-out ignoring abilities it got from class & level (also meaning there was always a temptation to break character), and radically under-contributing to the group.</p><p></p><p>In 5e you could still do those things and count on the DM to tailor challenges so your lack of contribution doesn't hold the party back, and even tailor specific challenges that only you can get the party through, thus giving you your share of spotlight time and maintaining 5e's style of balance. (Which is, let's face it, exactly what's happening via 'author force' in fictional examples.)</p><p></p><p>The DM also always has the option of dropping a potent magic item on an under-performing character to bring him up to snuff. </p><p></p><p></p><p> Nod. 4e was more into 'player entitlement,' so if you wanted to play a character that didn't /seem/ to do much, you had options to do so - and still contribute without seeming to as directly. It didn't even seem like it was a design intent, just something players figured out was possible with certain build choices.</p><p></p><p>I suppose I could argue that in both cases D&D wasn't doing much to enable the character concept, it had just provided tools that the DM or Player could use to do so, if they saw a way and made the effort.</p><p></p><p> Yeah, I finally took a look at that one, it was interesting. My list of stuff I should check out some time is growing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p> There /is/ such crunch: Inspiration. Play up what you wrote down in those spots on your character sheet, earn a treat.</p><p></p><p>(As you can probably guess, I'm not crazy about such mechanics, but it's definitely there, and is part of that sub-system, so could be said to be a point of it.)</p><p></p><p> One of the most notorious 3e optimization exploits was the Diplomancer build, able to turn hostile or suspicious strangers into helpful new best friends with a single roll of the d20. </p><p></p><p> (Depending on the edition, that might not have been all their fault. It's not like 1e, for instance, let you decide to invest your fighter's skill ranks in non-combat skills.)</p><p></p><p> Congrats for leaving them some 'player agency.' <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I've heard more than a few stories of Village of Hommlet going that way, the first time I ran it, it almost did, but for one player who kept pushing to go investigate the Moathouse (thanks John, you're a prince).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7049774, member: 996"] Yes. The issue was never so much that you couldn't build a seemingly incompetent or non-combatant character, as that doing so would require intentionally 'gimping' it with very bad choices, or flat-out ignoring abilities it got from class & level (also meaning there was always a temptation to break character), and radically under-contributing to the group. In 5e you could still do those things and count on the DM to tailor challenges so your lack of contribution doesn't hold the party back, and even tailor specific challenges that only you can get the party through, thus giving you your share of spotlight time and maintaining 5e's style of balance. (Which is, let's face it, exactly what's happening via 'author force' in fictional examples.) The DM also always has the option of dropping a potent magic item on an under-performing character to bring him up to snuff. Nod. 4e was more into 'player entitlement,' so if you wanted to play a character that didn't /seem/ to do much, you had options to do so - and still contribute without seeming to as directly. It didn't even seem like it was a design intent, just something players figured out was possible with certain build choices. I suppose I could argue that in both cases D&D wasn't doing much to enable the character concept, it had just provided tools that the DM or Player could use to do so, if they saw a way and made the effort. Yeah, I finally took a look at that one, it was interesting. My list of stuff I should check out some time is growing. :) There /is/ such crunch: Inspiration. Play up what you wrote down in those spots on your character sheet, earn a treat. (As you can probably guess, I'm not crazy about such mechanics, but it's definitely there, and is part of that sub-system, so could be said to be a point of it.) One of the most notorious 3e optimization exploits was the Diplomancer build, able to turn hostile or suspicious strangers into helpful new best friends with a single roll of the d20. (Depending on the edition, that might not have been all their fault. It's not like 1e, for instance, let you decide to invest your fighter's skill ranks in non-combat skills.) Congrats for leaving them some 'player agency.' ;) I've heard more than a few stories of Village of Hommlet going that way, the first time I ran it, it almost did, but for one player who kept pushing to go investigate the Moathouse (thanks John, you're a prince). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you feel 5e pressures you to build strong over fun?
Top