Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 9055063" data-attributes="member: 6779196">I would have no problem with that. I mean, for one thing I wouldn’t run the module exactly by-the-book. I like to make my games my own even when running modules, so a player playing in a White Plume Mountain game I was running who had read the module would find the game had same broad beats they were familiar with, but different details. It might even be enjoyable for them to see where my version differed from their expectations!I mean, people enjoy replaying video games, rewatching movies, rereading books. Why shouldn’t replaying D&amp;D adventures be just as enjoyable? Granted, there is a unique enjoyment on the first, “unspoiled” experience with a piece of media, and that goes for D&amp;D adventures too. But that doesn’t mean repeat viewings/plays can’t also be enjoyable in their own way. Personally, I think an adventure that wouldn’t be fun for players who have read the module or played through it before probably needs work.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 9055063, member: 6779196"] I would have no problem with that. I mean, for one thing I wouldn’t run the module exactly by-the-book. I like to make my games my own even when running modules, so a player playing in a [I]White Plume Mountain[/I] game I was running who had read the module would find the game had same broad beats they were familiar with, but different details. It might even be enjoyable for them to see where my version differed from their expectations! I mean, people enjoy replaying video games, rewatching movies, rereading books. Why shouldn’t replaying D&D adventures be just as enjoyable? Granted, there is a unique enjoyment on the first, “unspoiled” experience with a piece of media, and that goes for D&D adventures too. But that doesn’t mean repeat viewings/plays can’t also be enjoyable in their own way. Personally, I think an adventure that wouldn’t be fun for players who have read the module or played through it before probably needs work. [/QUOTE]

Verification