Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you miss attribute minimums/maximums?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 7181827" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>What??? He didn't take the feat at fourth level? Wait for level 6 or 8. It does not matter when, he will take the feat. IF he is the min/maxer you claim him to be. What you call prognostications, I call experience. As I have said, I introduced over a hundred players into the RPG specificaly D&D. I am still in contact with about 3 dozens DM in D&D and the trend is there. Maybe your personal experience shows you otherwise, but in the long run, it boils down to what I have said.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At least you gave me that point. From that point on, going the RP route for a novice is just a small step to make and not the giant leap that the set array involves. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course you can. I have absolutely no doubts about that. But what of the young inexperienced player? He needs a little nudge in the RP direction. When you have everything you want from the start, there is nothing to strive for. When the odds are not so favourable, you find ways to achieve your goals that are not from the normal receipe. With a bit of enticement, the young player will quickly mature into a well rounded RPGamer. The stats can explain the character's choices when they are different from one character to an other. With all the same stats, and no racial/classes min/max, all you have is the same chocolate cake that the neighbourg has. The decoration might be different, but the essence is the same. Whereas with the random stats, min/max racial/class requirement, you get to see strange choices. A pure 20th level champion with an 18 intelligence? You will not see that with the standard array. Never. But I have seen a 31st level Paladin with a score of 16 in intelligence. I have seen a wizard with 17 in strength that never took a single level in fighter class.</p><p></p><p>My first character ever made was a a lawfull good fighter with a 16 strength (about a 12 with today's way of calculating stats bonuses) and an 18 in intelligence. Arcana rolled at that. I switch to dual class as a wizard around level 7 and the RP involved, with the help of the master and the other players is still remember among us. I was almost 11 years old at the time. My fighter was lame, and yet, I assured a place in the imagination of my team mate as I switch to wizard and became their most powerful ally. I rose up to level 20 in three years. How could it have been done if I had had my way? I would've had the standard 16 in strength, maybe 14 in intelligence (I would've gone eldritch knight with the current rules...). I have seen this happening in first edition dozens upon dozens of times. Even in the 2e it was possible and to a certain extent in 3e. 4th and 5th edition removed the racial/class min/max requirement altogether and it saddens me a bit. </p><p></p><p>The one thing I am proud to see however is the removal of race ban on certain class. Now we can see dwarven wizards, elven bards and elven cleric going into high levels, gnome paladins (got one in one my groups, he's a blast to see) and many other things that were unimaginable back then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 7181827, member: 6855114"] What??? He didn't take the feat at fourth level? Wait for level 6 or 8. It does not matter when, he will take the feat. IF he is the min/maxer you claim him to be. What you call prognostications, I call experience. As I have said, I introduced over a hundred players into the RPG specificaly D&D. I am still in contact with about 3 dozens DM in D&D and the trend is there. Maybe your personal experience shows you otherwise, but in the long run, it boils down to what I have said. At least you gave me that point. From that point on, going the RP route for a novice is just a small step to make and not the giant leap that the set array involves. Of course you can. I have absolutely no doubts about that. But what of the young inexperienced player? He needs a little nudge in the RP direction. When you have everything you want from the start, there is nothing to strive for. When the odds are not so favourable, you find ways to achieve your goals that are not from the normal receipe. With a bit of enticement, the young player will quickly mature into a well rounded RPGamer. The stats can explain the character's choices when they are different from one character to an other. With all the same stats, and no racial/classes min/max, all you have is the same chocolate cake that the neighbourg has. The decoration might be different, but the essence is the same. Whereas with the random stats, min/max racial/class requirement, you get to see strange choices. A pure 20th level champion with an 18 intelligence? You will not see that with the standard array. Never. But I have seen a 31st level Paladin with a score of 16 in intelligence. I have seen a wizard with 17 in strength that never took a single level in fighter class. My first character ever made was a a lawfull good fighter with a 16 strength (about a 12 with today's way of calculating stats bonuses) and an 18 in intelligence. Arcana rolled at that. I switch to dual class as a wizard around level 7 and the RP involved, with the help of the master and the other players is still remember among us. I was almost 11 years old at the time. My fighter was lame, and yet, I assured a place in the imagination of my team mate as I switch to wizard and became their most powerful ally. I rose up to level 20 in three years. How could it have been done if I had had my way? I would've had the standard 16 in strength, maybe 14 in intelligence (I would've gone eldritch knight with the current rules...). I have seen this happening in first edition dozens upon dozens of times. Even in the 2e it was possible and to a certain extent in 3e. 4th and 5th edition removed the racial/class min/max requirement altogether and it saddens me a bit. The one thing I am proud to see however is the removal of race ban on certain class. Now we can see dwarven wizards, elven bards and elven cleric going into high levels, gnome paladins (got one in one my groups, he's a blast to see) and many other things that were unimaginable back then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you miss attribute minimums/maximums?
Top