Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Igwilly" data-source="post: 7181974" data-attributes="member: 6801225">Good for you. It's not my experience.Let's just say that: once, in the WotC's forums, some user told about his friend/relative DMing. One of the restrictions was: Paladins must be LG-only and Human-only.The number of people who suddenly were worried about how this game was &quot;restrictive&quot; and how s/he was &quot;spoiling the fun&quot; was incredible.You see, many people who said about how DMs can impose restrictions showed their other sides.That was not the only case I've seen.Also: 1) no one really cares about long-range teleportation magic, or which magic items they'll get (as in it's not something that would make them fight over it). 2) everyone is annoyed by 3e-style multiclass. 3) The halfling thing is really impressive, but it's very far from the reality I actually see happening. What about limiting which races get which classes or making Paladins LG-only (some old-school limitations)?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Igwilly, post: 7181974, member: 6801225"] Good for you. It's not my experience. Let's just say that: once, in the WotC's forums, some user told about his friend/relative DMing. One of the restrictions was: Paladins must be LG-only and Human-only. The number of people who suddenly were worried about how this game was "restrictive" and how s/he was "spoiling the fun" was incredible. You see, many people who said about how DMs can impose restrictions showed their other sides. That was not the only case I've seen. Also: 1) no one really cares about long-range teleportation magic, or which magic items they'll get (as in it's not something that would make them fight over it). 2) everyone is annoyed by 3e-style multiclass. 3) The halfling thing is really impressive, but it's very far from the reality I actually see happening. What about limiting which races get which classes or making Paladins LG-only (some old-school limitations)? [/QUOTE]

Verification