Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you miss attribute minimums/maximums?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7189476" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Well, what I'm trying to get at is that at one point in my DMing career, I got a great idea in my head for how to solve the problem that magic items in D&D didn't feel magical. They weren't mysterious, numinous, eclectic, dangerous, unpredictable, weirdness magnets the way that magic items tend to appear in fiction. And I think I actually worked out how to give magic items flavor, and starting implementing my 'great idea'.</p><p></p><p>And the problem was, that while my idea was achieving the flavor goals I set out to solve, mechanically it was just much too fussy. And in particular, the very idea that the magic item was mysterious and somewhat outside the player's control, even in situations where the item wasn't that complicated, meant that the player did not have full mechanical understanding of the item, which in turn meant that I the DM had to track all the information that the player didn't know and apply it to every scene. Like several of my 'good ideas', when I put it into practice, I found that I had to abandon it very early.</p><p></p><p>Still, one upshot of that experiment is that I often have very complicated magic items in my game. One of the swords in the party, an intelligent, legacy <em>+2 keen eager rapier of swiftness</em> has a nearly page long description that makes the above item seem trivially simple. Fortunately, at this point, the player has unlocked enough of his weapons secrets that I'm happy to let him track the bookkeeping. Likewise, the <em>ancient monkey skull</em> is a very complicated item with a two paragraph long description, that took the player about 4 levels of play and two years game time to figure out, but because it's a strictly command activated item, it placed no bookkeeping burden on me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Multiply the severity of that problem by like 30 and I think you'll see why the problem is not so much that you have to rework D&D to have numinous items, but that you have to do too much bookkeeping. Whereas, if there was some means by which the players dice roll was modified secretly and automatically and reported to me through a secure channel because the players character sheet understood what the items did even if the character's player did not, then what I was going for could work.</p><p></p><p>The only other way to achieve this goal I can think of is to have a rules light system where everything works according to the GM's whim, which then does make for mysterious magic, but in my opinion goes too much the other way and permanently removes the possibility of understanding by the player. At that point, the player is basically just along for the ride.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I was in a situation where frequently, just sticking an object in your pack could have long term mechanical consequences. I try to avoid that now as much as possible.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my game, if player's lose their notes on an item, they've also misplaced the item somewhere, likely never to recover it. Believe me when I say that this ensures the most meticulous record keeper in the party will in the long term be chosen as party treasurer and he'll be frequently audited.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7189476, member: 4937"] Well, what I'm trying to get at is that at one point in my DMing career, I got a great idea in my head for how to solve the problem that magic items in D&D didn't feel magical. They weren't mysterious, numinous, eclectic, dangerous, unpredictable, weirdness magnets the way that magic items tend to appear in fiction. And I think I actually worked out how to give magic items flavor, and starting implementing my 'great idea'. And the problem was, that while my idea was achieving the flavor goals I set out to solve, mechanically it was just much too fussy. And in particular, the very idea that the magic item was mysterious and somewhat outside the player's control, even in situations where the item wasn't that complicated, meant that the player did not have full mechanical understanding of the item, which in turn meant that I the DM had to track all the information that the player didn't know and apply it to every scene. Like several of my 'good ideas', when I put it into practice, I found that I had to abandon it very early. Still, one upshot of that experiment is that I often have very complicated magic items in my game. One of the swords in the party, an intelligent, legacy [I]+2 keen eager rapier of swiftness[/I] has a nearly page long description that makes the above item seem trivially simple. Fortunately, at this point, the player has unlocked enough of his weapons secrets that I'm happy to let him track the bookkeeping. Likewise, the [I]ancient monkey skull[/I] is a very complicated item with a two paragraph long description, that took the player about 4 levels of play and two years game time to figure out, but because it's a strictly command activated item, it placed no bookkeeping burden on me. Multiply the severity of that problem by like 30 and I think you'll see why the problem is not so much that you have to rework D&D to have numinous items, but that you have to do too much bookkeeping. Whereas, if there was some means by which the players dice roll was modified secretly and automatically and reported to me through a secure channel because the players character sheet understood what the items did even if the character's player did not, then what I was going for could work. The only other way to achieve this goal I can think of is to have a rules light system where everything works according to the GM's whim, which then does make for mysterious magic, but in my opinion goes too much the other way and permanently removes the possibility of understanding by the player. At that point, the player is basically just along for the ride. I was in a situation where frequently, just sticking an object in your pack could have long term mechanical consequences. I try to avoid that now as much as possible. In my game, if player's lose their notes on an item, they've also misplaced the item somewhere, likely never to recover it. Believe me when I say that this ensures the most meticulous record keeper in the party will in the long term be chosen as party treasurer and he'll be frequently audited. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you miss attribute minimums/maximums?
Top