Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="paradox42" data-source="post: 2874535" data-attributes="member: 29746">I for one will never understand the perspective that low-level games are more fun than high-level ones. I play RPGs to escape real-world drudgery, not revel in it! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I voted yes, since my games are always intended to go beyond mid levels (assuming, of course, that they can go on long enough). And I often make advancement at the lowest levels very fast, because I've never found them the least bit fun as a player or a DM- the sooner the characters are out of them, the more comfortable I am. Right now I'm running one Epic game (with highest-level PCs at 26th) and one near-Epic one (lowest PC level is 15th as of the last session).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="paradox42, post: 2874535, member: 29746"] I for one will never understand the perspective that low-level games are more fun than high-level ones. I play RPGs to [i]escape[/i] real-world drudgery, not revel in it! ;) I voted yes, since my games are always intended to go beyond mid levels (assuming, of course, that they can go on long enough). And I often make advancement at the lowest levels very fast, because I've never found them the least bit fun as a player or a DM- the sooner the characters are out of them, the more comfortable I am. Right now I'm running one Epic game (with highest-level PCs at 26th) and one near-Epic one (lowest PC level is 15th as of the last session). [/QUOTE]

Verification