Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DM-Rocco" data-source="post: 3602153" data-attributes="member: 14451">Back in AD&D, no, not at all, but ever since 3.0-, yes, you have to.(DISCLAIMER: now that I said you have to, I will say you should, because if I make such a broad statement as to say you ALL have to, I will get no end of people yelling that I am speaking for them.  To which I say, grow up, you now what I mean  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> )Anyway, with so many feats, skills, spells and classes out there, you really have to take a look at the bigger picture.  When I got back into D&D during 3.0, I didn't give it that much thought, but once I realized that there are way to many options and now requirments, yes, you have to.If you want whirlwind, you have to plan ahead for that.  If you are playing a fighter, you might want weapon focus at first level, but you eventualy want endurance as well, so you take a human feat or a character feat at first level of endurance at first level and you take weapon focus at second level.If you want to qualify for a prestiege class, you have to plan that out as early as level one.Personally, even if I never end up playing a character that I make, I map him or her out to level 20.  I know what feats I want to take at each level and what classes I will take at each level.  I won't break down the skills until I level, but I map the rest out.  You really have to, or at least, you should.</blockquote>

Verification