Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 9273721" data-attributes="member: 6901101">I replied to the poll, and then expanded the conversation with my own reasoning. I am not being dismissive of the people who said no. I stated the people on these forums does not make the average player base. I also think there are many people on these forums that hated what Tasha's did. There are threads with 100-page arguments over Tasha's new rulesets. In real life too. I knew people that thought Tasha's new rulesets were terrible. And... Just like that, it seems everyone adopted them anyways. Why? Because the players realized they could make stronger characters using Tasha's ruleset. Power creep will always win. I actually think it was one of the reasons why 4th edition wasn't a smash hit. Because 3.5 characters felt stronger. They felt easier to break. 4e was so mechanically sound that it was difficult for the player to feel the same way they did when playing 3.5.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott Christian, post: 9273721, member: 6901101"] I replied to the poll, and then expanded the conversation with my own reasoning. I am not being dismissive of the people who said no. I stated the people on these forums does not make the average player base. I also think there are many people on these forums that hated what Tasha's did. There are threads with 100-page arguments over Tasha's new rulesets. In real life too. I knew people that thought Tasha's new rulesets were terrible. And... Just like that, it seems everyone adopted them anyways. Why? Because the players realized they could make stronger characters using Tasha's ruleset. Power creep will always win. I actually think it was one of the reasons why 4th edition wasn't a smash hit. Because 3.5 characters [I]felt[/I] stronger. They [I]felt[/I] easier to break. 4e was so mechanically sound that it was difficult for the player to [I]feel[/I] the same way they did when playing 3.5. [/QUOTE]

Verification