Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9274514" data-attributes="member: 93670">Authoritarian table came up in 697 supporting the same allowed unless the GM meets the high bar you've been pushing for.&nbsp; I'm not going to link to 697 because you literally quoted one while accusing me of inventing it.With your &quot;invented&quot; claim out of the way we can move back to your incorrect revisionism over if cross edition is allowed by default or not.&nbsp; When cross edition is not allowed by default there is no reason for the gm to have any need to present a rationale for excluding either book simply because it's not allowed any more than a 3.5 shock trooper&nbsp; build would be allowed.&nbsp; So yes, you have been pushing for it to be allowed by default and now you are using the social contract as a club against the GM so players can simply majority vote to decide for the GM who is incapable of being &quot;among equals&quot;(first or not).&nbsp; &nbsp; They are not&quot;among equals&quot; because the GM has a much larger plate of responsibilities workload &amp; importance... If one player can't make it or pulls a no-show play usually&nbsp; happens anyways... If the gm does that, the game does not happen.&nbsp; There might be some other game, but not the one that the missing GM runs</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9274514, member: 93670"] Authoritarian table came up in 697 supporting the same allowed unless the GM meets the high bar you've been pushing for. I'm not going to link to 697 because you literally quoted one while accusing me of inventing it. With your "invented" claim out of the way we can move back to your incorrect revisionism over if cross edition is allowed by default or not. When cross edition is not allowed by default there is no reason for the gm to have any need to present a rationale for excluding either book simply because it's not allowed any more than a 3.5 shock trooper build would be allowed. So yes, you have been pushing for it to be allowed by default and now you are using the social contract as a club against the GM so players can simply majority vote to decide for the GM who is incapable of being "among equals"(first or not). They are not"among equals" because the GM has a much larger plate of responsibilities workload & importance... If one player can't make it or pulls a no-show play usually happens anyways... If the gm does that, the game does not happen. There might be some other game, but not the one that the missing GM runs [/QUOTE]

Verification