Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 9275236" data-attributes="member: 205">We have discussions like this:&quot;Hey, DM, I was working on a new character concept, I was using this particular set of rules to try out class X.&quot;&quot;OK, I see, what you're going for.&nbsp; I'm a little worried that class feature Y might cause friction with other player's character, and it overlaps with some NPCs I'm planning on using, and might weaken their impact if you have that ability too.&quot;&quot;That makes sense.&nbsp; Let me work on another concept then.&quot;&quot;No, wait, hold on.&nbsp; If we just adjust this class feature Y to work more like Z, I think we can make this work.&nbsp; Let me check something...&quot;Both parties are willing to accommodate the other person's ideas, and are willing to change their ideas if it might cause unneeded friction.&nbsp; If people are actually digging in their heels about a certain game element, then the table is already way too contentious for me.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TwoSix, post: 9275236, member: 205"] We have discussions like this: "Hey, DM, I was working on a new character concept, I was using this particular set of rules to try out class X." "OK, I see, what you're going for. I'm a little worried that class feature Y might cause friction with other player's character, and it overlaps with some NPCs I'm planning on using, and might weaken their impact if you have that ability too." "That makes sense. Let me work on another concept then." "No, wait, hold on. If we just adjust this class feature Y to work more like Z, I think we can make this work. Let me check something..." Both parties are willing to accommodate the other person's ideas, and are willing to change their ideas if it might cause unneeded friction. If people are actually digging in their heels about a certain game element, then the table is already way too contentious for me. [/QUOTE]

Verification