Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 9275338" data-attributes="member: 59816">All of this recent side-discussion is dependent on everyone being reasonable and trustworthy. Something that you can enforce by only playing with reasonable and trustworthy players/DMs or by placing firm and understood guidelines and limitations. Or in other words, while I work very much like [USER=205]@TwoSix[/USER] does (in that I trust most of my players to Play Nicely With Others) and don't place limitations for (as I see it) limitations' sake, and therefore allow almost anything, within reason, I think I can understand why some folks feel that it's just safer to have well spoken session zeros and clear rules of conduct.It's very similar in a lot of ways to the discussion on the Ignore function. I don't have anyone on ignore, because I trust my own ability to not be overly bothered by anything they say (it takes a lot of practice and I fail sometimes, but I do pretty well).I can roll with most things that a player can throw at me, without disrupting the table. IF, on the other hand, a player's actions/choices ARE bothering the table (IE Not Playing Nice With Others), I will first talk to them seriously about it, try to get them to change, or ask them to leave.</blockquote>