Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 9278644" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>Sorry this response took so long, but due to the recent changes on the site, one of my devices can no longer make posts.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The feature facilitates this by describing how the character’s background affects the world around them. It’s possible the DM could arrive at the same determination by adjudicating directly from the character’s background, but I don’t think it’s likely. I think the feature is additive in this regard. For example, outside of the Heart of Darkness feature, the Haunted One background doesn’t mention how the world reacts to the HO other than they are isolated and of questionable sanity which is more about the HO’s experience than how other people see them. HoD forms the basis of an agreement between the players and the DM that, in interactions with commoners specifically, the background will have certain effects. Without the feature, extrapolating directly from the background, the DM could rule the commoners, seeing the "darkness" in the HO’s eyes, react by attempting to capture and imprison the "crazy person" in their midst or by trying to drive them out of town.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Just because a specific DM could choose to just let it slide doesn’t mean the absence of the feature would have no effect on gameplay. The player wouldn't have the predictability of the feature to rely on in their interactions with commoners, and the DM might not know what the player is expecting as a reaction. To replace the work currently being done by the feature would require the players and DM to form an agreement about who the HO is and their place in the world.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, I'm not sure why such a ruling might be made. I mean, your character doesn't stop being an HO when initiative is rolled. From your example, it seems that everyone had forgotten about your background until combat was about to begin. Maybe initiative had already been rolled, I don't know. At that point, you made some kind of declaration that pointed towards HoD to remind the DM how commoners were supposed to behave towards your character, and the DM decided (retroactively perhaps) that combat wasn't starting after all. Now, it seems to me HoD should have been in play as soon as your character started interacting with the commoners, possibly averting the move towards combat, but without more detail about the situation and the gameplay around it, it's difficult to say how I would see this going myself.</p><p></p><p>EtA: Also, I'm not sure what bearing the rulings of "some DMs" have on the value of background features.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 9278644, member: 6787503"] Sorry this response took so long, but due to the recent changes on the site, one of my devices can no longer make posts. The feature facilitates this by describing how the character’s background affects the world around them. It’s possible the DM could arrive at the same determination by adjudicating directly from the character’s background, but I don’t think it’s likely. I think the feature is additive in this regard. For example, outside of the Heart of Darkness feature, the Haunted One background doesn’t mention how the world reacts to the HO other than they are isolated and of questionable sanity which is more about the HO’s experience than how other people see them. HoD forms the basis of an agreement between the players and the DM that, in interactions with commoners specifically, the background will have certain effects. Without the feature, extrapolating directly from the background, the DM could rule the commoners, seeing the "darkness" in the HO’s eyes, react by attempting to capture and imprison the "crazy person" in their midst or by trying to drive them out of town. Just because a specific DM could choose to just let it slide doesn’t mean the absence of the feature would have no effect on gameplay. The player wouldn't have the predictability of the feature to rely on in their interactions with commoners, and the DM might not know what the player is expecting as a reaction. To replace the work currently being done by the feature would require the players and DM to form an agreement about who the HO is and their place in the world. Okay, I'm not sure why such a ruling might be made. I mean, your character doesn't stop being an HO when initiative is rolled. From your example, it seems that everyone had forgotten about your background until combat was about to begin. Maybe initiative had already been rolled, I don't know. At that point, you made some kind of declaration that pointed towards HoD to remind the DM how commoners were supposed to behave towards your character, and the DM decided (retroactively perhaps) that combat wasn't starting after all. Now, it seems to me HoD should have been in play as soon as your character started interacting with the commoners, possibly averting the move towards combat, but without more detail about the situation and the gameplay around it, it's difficult to say how I would see this going myself. EtA: Also, I'm not sure what bearing the rulings of "some DMs" have on the value of background features. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
Top