Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 9345713" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>You were totally opposed to it every other time I brought it up, because it was still too unrealistic for you. </p><p></p><p>It has everything to do with the feature. The feature is you know a contact, who in turn, will get in touch with other people for you. That's literally what the feature is <em>called: </em><strong>Criminal Contact</strong>. Not "Local Messengers Who You Know" or "Criminal Contact Plus Messengers." The messengers are merely <em>an </em>explanation for how you get in touch with the contact. They're certainly not the only explanation, nor are they actually required. The only thing that's required is that you get in touch with your contact in some way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>See what I mean? You refuse to do anything to make it explainable because you insist on sticking to the exact phrasing. This is 100% you only going by RAW. </p><p></p><p>And this is why it doesn't matter how many times you <em>say</em> you only care about the explainable, all of your <em>actions</em> are showing the exact opposite. </p><p></p><p>If you want to actually show you care about the logical and explainable, then you need to prove it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I love how I'm supposed to just accept your opinion (and am being insulting if I don't), but my readings are "twisted" and "completely wrong."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 9345713, member: 6915329"] You were totally opposed to it every other time I brought it up, because it was still too unrealistic for you. It has everything to do with the feature. The feature is you know a contact, who in turn, will get in touch with other people for you. That's literally what the feature is [I]called: [/I][B]Criminal Contact[/B]. Not "Local Messengers Who You Know" or "Criminal Contact Plus Messengers." The messengers are merely [I]an [/I]explanation for how you get in touch with the contact. They're certainly not the only explanation, nor are they actually required. The only thing that's required is that you get in touch with your contact in some way. See what I mean? You refuse to do anything to make it explainable because you insist on sticking to the exact phrasing. This is 100% you only going by RAW. And this is why it doesn't matter how many times you [I]say[/I] you only care about the explainable, all of your [I]actions[/I] are showing the exact opposite. If you want to actually show you care about the logical and explainable, then you need to prove it. I love how I'm supposed to just accept your opinion (and am being insulting if I don't), but my readings are "twisted" and "completely wrong." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
Top