Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9357160" data-attributes="member: 7034611">I said it is nonsensical to know them everywhere, not that it is nonsensical to know anynot really, and I explained more than once why neither one makes senseyes, we agreed that if the table agrees on something, that something is true for the table. That does not really solve anything however, that is just a prerequisite, the real question is whether the table would agree and should agreeknowing them in all places does not make sense to meand I disagree with the ‘Bingo, you know them’ approach, it is nonsensical. I want something that makes sense in the world and not get a shoulder shrug when the problem of it making sense in the world is brought upfor all intents and purposes there is no difference between the two, if there is I’d like for you to explain itbut it means individual people within these groups, not anyone within them, a different interpretation is yet again nonsensicalI do not know them and even if I recognize someone as being a sailor, that does not at all mean they can pass on a message to my contact. None of this is an argument, it is all just utter nonsense that defies reality, logic and plain English</blockquote>