Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you really want dials and options?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aeolius" data-source="post: 5772032" data-attributes="member: 2072"><p>Options and Complexity Dials? I'm in.</p><p></p><p><strong>Complexity Dials</strong></p><p></p><p>From <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110614" target="_blank">HERE</a> we are given this graph:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/ll_20110614_2.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>Which was later expounded upon <a href="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110628" target="_blank">HERE</a> :</p><p></p><p> “Setting aside mechanics, I think you can boil D&D down to three basic activities: exploration, roleplay, and combat. Personal tastes vary as to which of the three is the most important, but I think most groups dabble in all three... From a design perspective, I think that you need to design a game that accommodates all three activities in an easy, intuitive manner. The rule set should provide at least basic support, with opt-in complexity or expansion in specific directions for groups that prefer one over the other. That concept is the root of the diagram I showed off two weeks ago.” </p><p></p><p>I explored the idea of the “complexity dial” over <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/307960-mearls-playing-core-d-d.html#post5605817" target="_blank">HERE</a> . In short, if implemented in an intuitive manner, one could use the dials to make a game that was combat-light (no minis, init/to hit/dmg only) and role-play heavy, or dial up combat for a night of dungeoncrawling. </p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Books</strong></p><p></p><p>You could even retool the monster books by challenge rating; MM1 for levels 1-5, MM2 for levels 6-10, MM3 for levels 11-15 and so on. If you wish to begin your campaign at a higher level, you could always opt for <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/313468-rule-3-10-31-2011-a-3.html#post5721610" target="_blank">My Monster Manual</a> , where you could create a book that was either fluff-heavy or statblock-rich. </p><p></p><p>DMGs could incorporate more specific adventure styles; DMG21containing the essence of Dungeonscape, DMG2 containing Cityscape, and so on. Players Handbooks would incorporate more complexities, throughout the series, and perhaps add alternate magic systems as well (psionics, Incarnum, Tome of Magic, and the like).</p><p></p><p>Then, I would break with tradition and release a World Builder’s Guide. This book would not only encourage DMs to build their own settings, but to do so in a manner that is consistent and structured. A sample campaign setting, the World of Greyhawk, would be introduced in the book, as well as bits from past environmental supplements. Further campaign settings would be released at later dates, using the format set forth in the WBG.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Online Play</strong></p><p></p><p>A bit like the complexity dial, the degree of technology present in the future incarnation of D&D should be a matter of preference. Self-confessed luddites could continue to play face-to-face tabletop games with no electronic assistance, while though who prefer chat-based, play-by-post, or VTT games would have their mediums of choice presented clearly in a chapter of the DMG devoted to gaming online.</p><p></p><p>Striking a happy medium, one could keep track of one’s character sheet via a Player app which would change dynamically as the game progressed. The DM could roll physical dice and enter the results, or simply let the DM app handle all the numbers. Ideally, one could run a face-to-face game while including videoconferencing/telepresence options for players who are unable to attend. </p><p></p><p>A proper D&D Virtual Tabletop (Mac OS/Windows/iOS), which would be play-tested and ready before the new ruleset was released, so that it’s use could be mentioned in the rulebooks. Playing online should be an integrated option from the beginning, not an afterthought. </p><p></p><p>All rulebooks would be available for purchase in EPUB3 format, incorporating video, audio, and interactive charts. </p><p></p><p><strong>Miniatures</strong></p><p></p><p>For use with Virtual Tabletops, players and DM’s alike could access free design apps like <a href="http://www.daz3d.com/i/products/daz_studio" target="_blank">DAZ Studio</a> or perhaps a custom version of a design application with a limited and intuitive feature set. WotC could sell various sanctioned models of core races, monsters, equipment, and so on. </p><p></p><p>With the advent of 3D printers. one could send your custom character design to WotC, who would then mold the model and ship it to your address.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aeolius, post: 5772032, member: 2072"] Options and Complexity Dials? I'm in. [B]Complexity Dials[/B] From [URL="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110614"]HERE[/URL] we are given this graph: [IMG]http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/ll_20110614_2.jpg[/IMG] Which was later expounded upon [URL="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110628"]HERE[/URL] : “Setting aside mechanics, I think you can boil D&D down to three basic activities: exploration, roleplay, and combat. Personal tastes vary as to which of the three is the most important, but I think most groups dabble in all three... From a design perspective, I think that you need to design a game that accommodates all three activities in an easy, intuitive manner. The rule set should provide at least basic support, with opt-in complexity or expansion in specific directions for groups that prefer one over the other. That concept is the root of the diagram I showed off two weeks ago.” I explored the idea of the “complexity dial” over [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/307960-mearls-playing-core-d-d.html#post5605817"]HERE[/URL] . In short, if implemented in an intuitive manner, one could use the dials to make a game that was combat-light (no minis, init/to hit/dmg only) and role-play heavy, or dial up combat for a night of dungeoncrawling. [B]Books[/B] You could even retool the monster books by challenge rating; MM1 for levels 1-5, MM2 for levels 6-10, MM3 for levels 11-15 and so on. If you wish to begin your campaign at a higher level, you could always opt for [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/313468-rule-3-10-31-2011-a-3.html#post5721610"]My Monster Manual[/URL] , where you could create a book that was either fluff-heavy or statblock-rich. DMGs could incorporate more specific adventure styles; DMG21containing the essence of Dungeonscape, DMG2 containing Cityscape, and so on. Players Handbooks would incorporate more complexities, throughout the series, and perhaps add alternate magic systems as well (psionics, Incarnum, Tome of Magic, and the like). Then, I would break with tradition and release a World Builder’s Guide. This book would not only encourage DMs to build their own settings, but to do so in a manner that is consistent and structured. A sample campaign setting, the World of Greyhawk, would be introduced in the book, as well as bits from past environmental supplements. Further campaign settings would be released at later dates, using the format set forth in the WBG. [B]Online Play[/B] A bit like the complexity dial, the degree of technology present in the future incarnation of D&D should be a matter of preference. Self-confessed luddites could continue to play face-to-face tabletop games with no electronic assistance, while though who prefer chat-based, play-by-post, or VTT games would have their mediums of choice presented clearly in a chapter of the DMG devoted to gaming online. Striking a happy medium, one could keep track of one’s character sheet via a Player app which would change dynamically as the game progressed. The DM could roll physical dice and enter the results, or simply let the DM app handle all the numbers. Ideally, one could run a face-to-face game while including videoconferencing/telepresence options for players who are unable to attend. A proper D&D Virtual Tabletop (Mac OS/Windows/iOS), which would be play-tested and ready before the new ruleset was released, so that it’s use could be mentioned in the rulebooks. Playing online should be an integrated option from the beginning, not an afterthought. All rulebooks would be available for purchase in EPUB3 format, incorporating video, audio, and interactive charts. [B]Miniatures[/B] For use with Virtual Tabletops, players and DM’s alike could access free design apps like [URL="http://www.daz3d.com/i/products/daz_studio"]DAZ Studio[/URL] or perhaps a custom version of a design application with a limited and intuitive feature set. WotC could sell various sanctioned models of core races, monsters, equipment, and so on. With the advent of 3D printers. one could send your custom character design to WotC, who would then mold the model and ship it to your address. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you really want dials and options?
Top