Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you remain Stealthed if you attack yourself?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5549041" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>You see, this is <em>incredibly</em> inconsistent and adding some massive complications. You allow the PC to do this normally, yet won't let them just say - pull out a non-magical full-blade (so the attack could never hit) to do it. What about being blinded beforehand and knocked prone in the middle of nowhere important, but not of their own choice? Would you disallow it? What's the difference?</p><p></p><p>You have pretty much no rules supporting you whatsoever, while I have the firm ruling that the Bag of Rats (and meaningful threat distinction in the RC) to support mine. At this point you're not using RAI for anything, you're purely going on an interpretation that is entirely arbitrary and basically creates almost case by case scenarios you need to specifically rule on every time they occur. I may be extremely strict with my interpretation, but it's extremely consistent and never breaks the game or any power. If you want an effect, suck it up charlie and attack something that is actually a meaningful threat. Not yourself. Not allies. A meaningful target and RAW 100% supports my interpretation.</p><p></p><p>Under your interpretation, I think a player could feel rightly aggrieved when your logic (with no rules support) can't explain why an effect works when using their +6 longsword and not their mundane dagger. Obviously in one case the attack is obviously going to miss by miles - but you've abandoned the RCs "Meaningful threat" distinction in the first place. So you're going to bury yourself in issues like this pretty quickly. Not to mention interpreting if a PC who ran, fell prone and tried to do it can't do it, while if a PC who was blinded by an enemies effect and has a -2 mark penalty (as an example), <em>could do it</em>.</p><p></p><p>What about effects that occur on powers that target creatures? Would you allow a PC to declare a chair as a target and then hit it to get phasing movement (I think avengers have a power that lets them phase). What about just pulling out a +2 mundane weapon and having a go at the fighter taking total defense to get the phasing movement effect?</p><p></p><p>This is just layers upon layers of nonsense that is simply stopped by what the rules already say can't be done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5549041, member: 78116"] You see, this is [i]incredibly[/i] inconsistent and adding some massive complications. You allow the PC to do this normally, yet won't let them just say - pull out a non-magical full-blade (so the attack could never hit) to do it. What about being blinded beforehand and knocked prone in the middle of nowhere important, but not of their own choice? Would you disallow it? What's the difference? You have pretty much no rules supporting you whatsoever, while I have the firm ruling that the Bag of Rats (and meaningful threat distinction in the RC) to support mine. At this point you're not using RAI for anything, you're purely going on an interpretation that is entirely arbitrary and basically creates almost case by case scenarios you need to specifically rule on every time they occur. I may be extremely strict with my interpretation, but it's extremely consistent and never breaks the game or any power. If you want an effect, suck it up charlie and attack something that is actually a meaningful threat. Not yourself. Not allies. A meaningful target and RAW 100% supports my interpretation. Under your interpretation, I think a player could feel rightly aggrieved when your logic (with no rules support) can't explain why an effect works when using their +6 longsword and not their mundane dagger. Obviously in one case the attack is obviously going to miss by miles - but you've abandoned the RCs "Meaningful threat" distinction in the first place. So you're going to bury yourself in issues like this pretty quickly. Not to mention interpreting if a PC who ran, fell prone and tried to do it can't do it, while if a PC who was blinded by an enemies effect and has a -2 mark penalty (as an example), [i]could do it[/i]. What about effects that occur on powers that target creatures? Would you allow a PC to declare a chair as a target and then hit it to get phasing movement (I think avengers have a power that lets them phase). What about just pulling out a +2 mundane weapon and having a go at the fighter taking total defense to get the phasing movement effect? This is just layers upon layers of nonsense that is simply stopped by what the rules already say can't be done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you remain Stealthed if you attack yourself?
Top