Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you still feel that One D&D is "Compatible" with 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8958009" data-attributes="member: 67338"><p>no... I think (much like 1e/2e and 3e/3.5) most tables will tell people "great idea, but here update with the new book" </p><p></p><p>and then we get the argument what compatible even means... to some it seems 3e,3.5,4e,and 5e are already 'compatible' since the stats are the same and the rolling method... for others things like status effect class features and other things make them VASTLY incompatible...</p><p></p><p>My bet is that what WotC wants (and everything I have heard leads me to believe this is it) is DM side compatibaility but player facing incompatability.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I bet 2024 we still see alot of cross over, maybe into 2025 (depending how late in 2024 the books come out) but over time everything 5e will just be "nah just upgrade...</p><p></p><p>and some of it HAS to upgrade. You can;t have 2 players hit with a level of exhaustion and it effect them differently. You can't have jump rules different at the same table. The same way you couldn't show up at 9 out of 10 (or more) 2e tables with a wizard with a 1e fireball with no level cap... or how 9 out of 10 tables wwould not let a 3.0 haste spell into 3.5.</p><p></p><p>Now I bet anything someone will try to "prove" me wrong by saying they played at a a table that did all of these things... but they are by far the minority I am sure.</p><p>HOWEVER I myself will disprove the strawman of "it CAN'T be done with a game in 3.5 that let players bring in any d20 characters and with 4 D&D characters we had a M&M superhero (a speedster) a Jedi from the saga star wars rules and a Jafar (not usre I spelled that right) with a p90 and staff weapon from stargate...</p><p>I ALSO ran a multiverse game that slowly got weirder and weirder... and I seeded what everyone thought was galactus (from marvel comics) a survivor of the last multiverse... until he showed up as a human wizard (keep in mind this is 5e) and he said that was a misunderstanding, he survived through multi multiverse deaths... and when someone hit him I said "Don't bother with damage, cause ping that's one off my stone skin" and my players flipped realizing I had taken a 2e wizard took him through 3e, 3.5,4e and now into 5e...</p><p>so it CAN be done. I had a whole 'order' of monks in that multiverse from 4e lead by a warlord as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GMforPowergamers, post: 8958009, member: 67338"] no... I think (much like 1e/2e and 3e/3.5) most tables will tell people "great idea, but here update with the new book" and then we get the argument what compatible even means... to some it seems 3e,3.5,4e,and 5e are already 'compatible' since the stats are the same and the rolling method... for others things like status effect class features and other things make them VASTLY incompatible... My bet is that what WotC wants (and everything I have heard leads me to believe this is it) is DM side compatibaility but player facing incompatability. I bet 2024 we still see alot of cross over, maybe into 2025 (depending how late in 2024 the books come out) but over time everything 5e will just be "nah just upgrade... and some of it HAS to upgrade. You can;t have 2 players hit with a level of exhaustion and it effect them differently. You can't have jump rules different at the same table. The same way you couldn't show up at 9 out of 10 (or more) 2e tables with a wizard with a 1e fireball with no level cap... or how 9 out of 10 tables wwould not let a 3.0 haste spell into 3.5. Now I bet anything someone will try to "prove" me wrong by saying they played at a a table that did all of these things... but they are by far the minority I am sure. HOWEVER I myself will disprove the strawman of "it CAN'T be done with a game in 3.5 that let players bring in any d20 characters and with 4 D&D characters we had a M&M superhero (a speedster) a Jedi from the saga star wars rules and a Jafar (not usre I spelled that right) with a p90 and staff weapon from stargate... I ALSO ran a multiverse game that slowly got weirder and weirder... and I seeded what everyone thought was galactus (from marvel comics) a survivor of the last multiverse... until he showed up as a human wizard (keep in mind this is 5e) and he said that was a misunderstanding, he survived through multi multiverse deaths... and when someone hit him I said "Don't bother with damage, cause ping that's one off my stone skin" and my players flipped realizing I had taken a 2e wizard took him through 3e, 3.5,4e and now into 5e... so it CAN be done. I had a whole 'order' of monks in that multiverse from 4e lead by a warlord as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you still feel that One D&D is "Compatible" with 5E?
Top