Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you think Haste is too powerful as is?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 497228" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p><strong>Re</strong></p><p></p><p>I can understand both sides of the argument, but I still tend to think haste is not overpowered. I am glad they finally gave casters a spell to help them unleash magic at a faster rate.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I feel wizards should stand heads and tails above the other classes in overall power, just as they do in most fantasy books. They should only be thwarted on the rare occasions they face an extremely magic resistant creature such as a golem, dragon, or some epic monster. Magic is and should be superior in all ways save giving and receiving melee damage.</p><p></p><p>Also, the argument that haste is a must have spell is very weak. I can think of several other spells that are must have spells such as the following:</p><p></p><p>Magic Missile </p><p>Shield </p><p>See Invisibility</p><p>Fireball or Lightning Bolt</p><p>Dispel Magic or Greater Dispel</p><p>Disintegrate</p><p>Teleport or Teleport no Error</p><p></p><p>The above spells you will find on the spell list of about 95% or higher of all wizards and sorcerers. They are spells that stand out for their level in both usefulness and damaging capability.</p><p></p><p>I might buy into the argument that haste should be a higher level spell if it were not so easy to defeat. A simple lvl 3 slow spell automatically dispels haste on multiple targets. A dispel magic also counters haste. Spells such as hold person or monster, charm person or monster, and dominate person or monster can effectively eliminate haste or turn it against the party. Also, Minor Globe of Invulnerability renders haste useless when within its confines. An anti-magic field also renders haste inactive. Even the spell mass haste can be easily defeated by the 3rd level slow spell.</p><p></p><p>Enemy arcane casters or enemies period should always have access to haste or haste counter measures. Anyone who studies real world combat can comprehend that combat is often a redundant activity requiring the same weapons and equipment each and every battle with only slight variation depending on circumstance. I liken haste to the assault rifle or grenade of a soldier or in fantasy terms, the sword and armor of a fighter. It is standard issue and everytime you face a wizard of any power, you can expect they will utilize haste. </p><p></p><p>An army of any power should have access to haste considering its value on the combat field. Haste potions are fairly easy to create and high level NPC's or elite units should have little trouble obtaining haste potions for use against the PC's. And considering how common haste would be, the slow spell, the countermeasure for haste, should be just as readily available to enemy casters.</p><p></p><p>Basically, if haste is the must have spell, then the countermeasure is a must have spell as well. Woe to the unprepared caster who does not have that slow or dispel magic spell ready to counter an enemies haste, whether they be PC or NPC.</p><p></p><p>The only good argument for haste being overpowered is one of personal style. Some people prefer low magic campaigns where the arcane casters can't unleash a barrage of powerful magic to destroy their enemies. This I can understand. If a person wants a world where magic doesn't allow arcane casters an immense advantage, then haste is definitely one of those spells that could be considered overpowered. It definitely gives an arcane caster an immense advantage over any other class who cannot counter or equal the effects of haste.</p><p></p><p></p><p>P.S.: The only spell I would really like to see an official fix for is the harm spell. Harm is vastly overpowered as it is currently written. Harm is the only truly imbalanced, overpowered spell in the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 497228, member: 5834"] [b]Re[/b] I can understand both sides of the argument, but I still tend to think haste is not overpowered. I am glad they finally gave casters a spell to help them unleash magic at a faster rate. Personally, I feel wizards should stand heads and tails above the other classes in overall power, just as they do in most fantasy books. They should only be thwarted on the rare occasions they face an extremely magic resistant creature such as a golem, dragon, or some epic monster. Magic is and should be superior in all ways save giving and receiving melee damage. Also, the argument that haste is a must have spell is very weak. I can think of several other spells that are must have spells such as the following: Magic Missile Shield See Invisibility Fireball or Lightning Bolt Dispel Magic or Greater Dispel Disintegrate Teleport or Teleport no Error The above spells you will find on the spell list of about 95% or higher of all wizards and sorcerers. They are spells that stand out for their level in both usefulness and damaging capability. I might buy into the argument that haste should be a higher level spell if it were not so easy to defeat. A simple lvl 3 slow spell automatically dispels haste on multiple targets. A dispel magic also counters haste. Spells such as hold person or monster, charm person or monster, and dominate person or monster can effectively eliminate haste or turn it against the party. Also, Minor Globe of Invulnerability renders haste useless when within its confines. An anti-magic field also renders haste inactive. Even the spell mass haste can be easily defeated by the 3rd level slow spell. Enemy arcane casters or enemies period should always have access to haste or haste counter measures. Anyone who studies real world combat can comprehend that combat is often a redundant activity requiring the same weapons and equipment each and every battle with only slight variation depending on circumstance. I liken haste to the assault rifle or grenade of a soldier or in fantasy terms, the sword and armor of a fighter. It is standard issue and everytime you face a wizard of any power, you can expect they will utilize haste. An army of any power should have access to haste considering its value on the combat field. Haste potions are fairly easy to create and high level NPC's or elite units should have little trouble obtaining haste potions for use against the PC's. And considering how common haste would be, the slow spell, the countermeasure for haste, should be just as readily available to enemy casters. Basically, if haste is the must have spell, then the countermeasure is a must have spell as well. Woe to the unprepared caster who does not have that slow or dispel magic spell ready to counter an enemies haste, whether they be PC or NPC. The only good argument for haste being overpowered is one of personal style. Some people prefer low magic campaigns where the arcane casters can't unleash a barrage of powerful magic to destroy their enemies. This I can understand. If a person wants a world where magic doesn't allow arcane casters an immense advantage, then haste is definitely one of those spells that could be considered overpowered. It definitely gives an arcane caster an immense advantage over any other class who cannot counter or equal the effects of haste. P.S.: The only spell I would really like to see an official fix for is the harm spell. Harm is vastly overpowered as it is currently written. Harm is the only truly imbalanced, overpowered spell in the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you think Haste is too powerful as is?
Top