Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you think the OGL was a good idea?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6293725" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>It's actually not as hard as it might seem. WotC have three big advantages:</p><p></p><p>- <em>Massive</em> name recognition. Here, I'll note that Mongoose used the OGL to produce a pocket PHB that, despite whatever anger WotC may have felt about it, had <em>no</em> appreciable impact on PHB sales. Likewise, an 'official' character builder will always do well against an 'unofficial' one, regardless of content.</p><p></p><p>- They get to control the release schedule. So, no reason they couldn't release the new books (and material) to DDI, and thus the official generator, a couple of months ahead.</p><p></p><p>- And, of course, they get to control <em>what</em> gets released as 'open'. Since virutally none of the 3.5e supplements contained any open material, an official generator would have had a huge advantage. (And while existing generators might include material from "Complete Warrior" et al, they do so only so long as WotC don't shut them down; you can bet that if WotC were in direct competition, they <em>would</em>.)</p><p></p><p>In fact, the bigger difficulty is how (and whether) to include third-party materials into the 'official' DDI generator. Failing to include them, especially if that material becomes popular, reduces the perceived value of the DDI sub, while allowing their inclusion is potentially problematic for legal and technical reasons.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. WotC never managed to get a decent one together, and then they gave up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 6293725, member: 22424"] It's actually not as hard as it might seem. WotC have three big advantages: - [i]Massive[/i] name recognition. Here, I'll note that Mongoose used the OGL to produce a pocket PHB that, despite whatever anger WotC may have felt about it, had [i]no[/i] appreciable impact on PHB sales. Likewise, an 'official' character builder will always do well against an 'unofficial' one, regardless of content. - They get to control the release schedule. So, no reason they couldn't release the new books (and material) to DDI, and thus the official generator, a couple of months ahead. - And, of course, they get to control [I]what[/I] gets released as 'open'. Since virutally none of the 3.5e supplements contained any open material, an official generator would have had a huge advantage. (And while existing generators might include material from "Complete Warrior" et al, they do so only so long as WotC don't shut them down; you can bet that if WotC were in direct competition, they [i]would[/i].) In fact, the bigger difficulty is how (and whether) to include third-party materials into the 'official' DDI generator. Failing to include them, especially if that material becomes popular, reduces the perceived value of the DDI sub, while allowing their inclusion is potentially problematic for legal and technical reasons. Yes. WotC never managed to get a decent one together, and then they gave up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you think the OGL was a good idea?
Top