Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you think they will add more races to PHB2024 to make up for dropping other stuff?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9129369" data-attributes="member: 7040132"><p>Agreed, and it's frustrating for the mechanical-only crowd to call the refluff-friendly rules racist (which is what is being done by by using real world racist labeling like the One Drop Rule. It's inflammatory rhetoric that is inaccurate.) The mechanics are not the only factor in determining species. I feel that it's not even more important. I think that is the big divide here. The refluff crowd sees the ability to have any hybrid as a boon to the narrative, opening mixed species options, and it's not erasing anything.</p><p></p><p>Here are my concerns leading to my belief that another pass at the "Children of Different Humanoid Kinds" rules would be appropriate:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">It's weird to have "Half-elves" as the only hybrid race option. THAT sounds exclusionary. Note that some Half-elf supporters are fine with replacing Half-orcs stats with Orc stats, which suggests that it is merely a personal preference for a particular species, rather than a moral argument. Doing it for one hybrid race suggests that the same treatment should be given to all hybrids. But it is far beyond the scope of the game to create all the unique Half-species entries (including building lore for hundreds of hybrid combos), or to create a build-a-species system. These won't fit into the PH and wouldn't be able to take every other species in other books into consideration.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Currently, Half-elves are not significantly mechanically unique in a way that warrants their own entry. When compared to the Elf, the variation is less than the elf lineages. They lose Trance and they get Skill Versatilty instead of Keen Senses (Perception). That is so minor. Even in BG3, half-elves are getting the Elf spells. It's almost a cosmetic variant. As I pointed out elsewhere, "Elf-kin" could totally be a subrace option under Elf if really necessary. Either way, if the "Half-elf" were to be included in the PH on its own, it would need to reimagined like the rest of the PH species. Would updating the mechanics erase the earlier Half-elf? No. So there should be no argument against changing it at all. Just compare the playtest Human to the earlier Humans. Though they look very different it doesn't erase the earlier variants. There is NO erasure, just a different focus in the next book. The Half-elf entry will still be in our 2014 books and in DDB. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">I would hazard a guess that if the "Children of Different Humanoid Kinds" rules became reality, and was implemented in DDB, we'd see so much more variety in characters built, even if the mechanics were not unique, because people care more about the story of their characters. I think elf/human hybrids will still be in a slight majority due to historical relevance (and they are traditionally pretty/charismatic), but being able to look like a Wood Elf, while have Forest Gnome abilities sounds pretty damn cool for people who don't want to play a Small character. Or if you want to look like a Dwarf but have Orc abilities, be a Dorc. It is a worthy effort to create the new Hybrid-friendly rules to OPEN more options, as a VARIANT for existing hybrids and non-represented hybrids. Every species in the UA is a variant of what came before in earlier books. Again, the earlier variants are not being erased.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 9129369, member: 7040132"] Agreed, and it's frustrating for the mechanical-only crowd to call the refluff-friendly rules racist (which is what is being done by by using real world racist labeling like the One Drop Rule. It's inflammatory rhetoric that is inaccurate.) The mechanics are not the only factor in determining species. I feel that it's not even more important. I think that is the big divide here. The refluff crowd sees the ability to have any hybrid as a boon to the narrative, opening mixed species options, and it's not erasing anything. Here are my concerns leading to my belief that another pass at the "Children of Different Humanoid Kinds" rules would be appropriate: [LIST=1] [*]It's weird to have "Half-elves" as the only hybrid race option. THAT sounds exclusionary. Note that some Half-elf supporters are fine with replacing Half-orcs stats with Orc stats, which suggests that it is merely a personal preference for a particular species, rather than a moral argument. Doing it for one hybrid race suggests that the same treatment should be given to all hybrids. But it is far beyond the scope of the game to create all the unique Half-species entries (including building lore for hundreds of hybrid combos), or to create a build-a-species system. These won't fit into the PH and wouldn't be able to take every other species in other books into consideration. [*]Currently, Half-elves are not significantly mechanically unique in a way that warrants their own entry. When compared to the Elf, the variation is less than the elf lineages. They lose Trance and they get Skill Versatilty instead of Keen Senses (Perception). That is so minor. Even in BG3, half-elves are getting the Elf spells. It's almost a cosmetic variant. As I pointed out elsewhere, "Elf-kin" could totally be a subrace option under Elf if really necessary. Either way, if the "Half-elf" were to be included in the PH on its own, it would need to reimagined like the rest of the PH species. Would updating the mechanics erase the earlier Half-elf? No. So there should be no argument against changing it at all. Just compare the playtest Human to the earlier Humans. Though they look very different it doesn't erase the earlier variants. There is NO erasure, just a different focus in the next book. The Half-elf entry will still be in our 2014 books and in DDB. [*]I would hazard a guess that if the "Children of Different Humanoid Kinds" rules became reality, and was implemented in DDB, we'd see so much more variety in characters built, even if the mechanics were not unique, because people care more about the story of their characters. I think elf/human hybrids will still be in a slight majority due to historical relevance (and they are traditionally pretty/charismatic), but being able to look like a Wood Elf, while have Forest Gnome abilities sounds pretty damn cool for people who don't want to play a Small character. Or if you want to look like a Dwarf but have Orc abilities, be a Dorc. It is a worthy effort to create the new Hybrid-friendly rules to OPEN more options, as a VARIANT for existing hybrids and non-represented hybrids. Every species in the UA is a variant of what came before in earlier books. Again, the earlier variants are not being erased. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you think they will add more races to PHB2024 to make up for dropping other stuff?
Top