Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Neil Bishop" data-source="post: 3775813" data-attributes="member: 55494">I agree with the concept of a reboot but I think any reboot has to be in the context of an overall consideration of what strategy to apply to developing the setting.The fundamental problem is that as soon as you think you have a decent handle on the setting as a DM, along comes a novel or novels that "wrecks" a plot point or idea that you have developed. How do you attract new DMs and players to a setting that is basically unplayable if you want to stick to canon?I like the 3E reboot as detailed in the FRCS, however, I think we're hitting the point known as "jumping the shark" with a huge glut of RSEs affecting the setting once again. The hints that have been posted on these boards seem to indicate that the 4E reboot will be the jumping of a dire shark with a kaiju template: it's simply too much.Sure, restart the game world 100 years in the future but stick to novels detailing the backstory of the revamped game world rather than driving the future.</blockquote>