Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Do you think WotC rebooting Forgotten Realms for 4e would be a good idea?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faraer" data-source="post: 3783664" data-attributes="member: 6318"><p>In answer to the thread question:</p><p></p><p>Signs are that the 2008 Realms will change significantly in feel and design sensibility. Given this,</p><p></p><p>If Rich Baker, Bruce Cordell, Rob Heinsoo and the rest of the in-house team can, in a couple of years, create and describe a setting that is anything like as rich as Ed Greenwood had by 1987, after twenty years of organic development through short stories and campaigns, I would be surprised.</p><p></p><p>I like Ed's world very much, and the work of those who've added to it sympathetically and creatively, from Jeff Grubb to George Krashos; more than the work I've seen of the authors of the 2008 book. So chances are I won't like the 2008 setting as much, myself, even if it's very good in its own right.</p><p></p><p>I emotionally disengaged from the current timeline over several years, so the events at the back of the <em>Grand History of the Realms</em> aren't as much a shock to me as to some. Some of those events I'm indifferent to. Others -- the destruction of the Weave, a powerful metaphor for the bonds of lore and love in the Realms, and not just the structure of magic but part of the metaphysical fabric of Toril itself -- I don't think much of at all.</p><p></p><p>If Wizards cease to publish the 14th-century Realms -- leaving the bulk of Ed's huge Realmslore backlog untouched, and many characters (Mirt, Sharanralee . . .) likely dead before their stories were ever told -- I'll be sad, though it will have had a wonderful run, despite my many misgivings with its treatment under Wizards and TSR. While Wizards has the legal right to do this, artistically and morally is another matter.</p><p></p><p>I will probably buy the 4E setting, and try to read it open-mindedly.</p><p></p><p>Commercially, given how often this kind of drastic shake-up has failed and how rarely it works -- never, that I recall, in D&D worlds -- it's certainly a big risk. I suspect there may be no short-term way, save an unpredictable sales surge, for Wizards to publish setting sourcebooks that make Hasbro-level profits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faraer, post: 3783664, member: 6318"] In answer to the thread question: Signs are that the 2008 Realms will change significantly in feel and design sensibility. Given this, If Rich Baker, Bruce Cordell, Rob Heinsoo and the rest of the in-house team can, in a couple of years, create and describe a setting that is anything like as rich as Ed Greenwood had by 1987, after twenty years of organic development through short stories and campaigns, I would be surprised. I like Ed's world very much, and the work of those who've added to it sympathetically and creatively, from Jeff Grubb to George Krashos; more than the work I've seen of the authors of the 2008 book. So chances are I won't like the 2008 setting as much, myself, even if it's very good in its own right. I emotionally disengaged from the current timeline over several years, so the events at the back of the [i]Grand History of the Realms[/i] aren't as much a shock to me as to some. Some of those events I'm indifferent to. Others -- the destruction of the Weave, a powerful metaphor for the bonds of lore and love in the Realms, and not just the structure of magic but part of the metaphysical fabric of Toril itself -- I don't think much of at all. If Wizards cease to publish the 14th-century Realms -- leaving the bulk of Ed's huge Realmslore backlog untouched, and many characters (Mirt, Sharanralee . . .) likely dead before their stories were ever told -- I'll be sad, though it will have had a wonderful run, despite my many misgivings with its treatment under Wizards and TSR. While Wizards has the legal right to do this, artistically and morally is another matter. I will probably buy the 4E setting, and try to read it open-mindedly. Commercially, given how often this kind of drastic shake-up has failed and how rarely it works -- never, that I recall, in D&D worlds -- it's certainly a big risk. I suspect there may be no short-term way, save an unpredictable sales surge, for Wizards to publish setting sourcebooks that make Hasbro-level profits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Do you think WotC rebooting Forgotten Realms for 4e would be a good idea?
Top