Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you use the Success w/ Complication Module in the DMG or Fail Forward in the Basic PDF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8285181" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Right. It doesn’t “leave those situations out,” implying that it gives no advice for how to handle them. It tells you specifically how to handle them: narrate success.</p><p></p><p>If the only options are positive change or no change, that isn’t a challenge, it’s a missable bonus. And kindly don’t call the way other people like to play garbage. I expect that kind of nonsense from Lanefan, but not from you.</p><p></p><p>Not by (the way I and others interpret) the rules of D&D 5e. If you lack the knowledge or skills to do something, it isn’t possible, and therefore you fail to do it without a roll. If you have the knowledge or skills to do it, a roll might be called for, if failure is possible and has a meaningful consequence. Otherwise you succeed.</p><p></p><p>It’s excellent advice. I have been playing by it for years and it has improved my games immeasurably since adopting it. I was skeptical at first, as I think most people are. It seems like it would make the game too easy. Like you’re giving something away for free. But in reality, it cuts through all the pointless rolls and keeps the game focused on meaningful, interesting challenges. It also encourages you to <em>create</em> challenges that are meaningful and interesting.</p><p></p><p>Maybe it wouldn’t be to your liking. If so, that’s fine. But it is definitely not bad advice.</p><p></p><p>Why? What’s the harm in letting them have it? If there’s no consequence for failure then getting it is the more interesting outcome anyway because at least then something <em>happens.</em></p><p></p><p>What a boring (non-)consequence for failure. Nothing has changed, nothing has been lost or gained.</p><p></p><p>This is why you <em>have to</em> disallow retries if you call for checks when there’s no consequence for failure. Because otherwise the roll would be literally nothing but a waste of time. By disallowing retries, what you’re doing is <em>introducing</em> a consequence for failure. That consequence being that success becomes impossible. That keeps the roll from being pointless, but it doesn’t actually make “nothing happens” an interesting outcome. Add in a guard who might find you if you take too long, now we have some actual dramatic stakes!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8285181, member: 6779196"] Right. It doesn’t “leave those situations out,” implying that it gives no advice for how to handle them. It tells you specifically how to handle them: narrate success. If the only options are positive change or no change, that isn’t a challenge, it’s a missable bonus. And kindly don’t call the way other people like to play garbage. I expect that kind of nonsense from Lanefan, but not from you. Not by (the way I and others interpret) the rules of D&D 5e. If you lack the knowledge or skills to do something, it isn’t possible, and therefore you fail to do it without a roll. If you have the knowledge or skills to do it, a roll might be called for, if failure is possible and has a meaningful consequence. Otherwise you succeed. It’s excellent advice. I have been playing by it for years and it has improved my games immeasurably since adopting it. I was skeptical at first, as I think most people are. It seems like it would make the game too easy. Like you’re giving something away for free. But in reality, it cuts through all the pointless rolls and keeps the game focused on meaningful, interesting challenges. It also encourages you to [I]create[/I] challenges that are meaningful and interesting. Maybe it wouldn’t be to your liking. If so, that’s fine. But it is definitely not bad advice. Why? What’s the harm in letting them have it? If there’s no consequence for failure then getting it is the more interesting outcome anyway because at least then something [I]happens.[/I] What a boring (non-)consequence for failure. Nothing has changed, nothing has been lost or gained. This is why you [I]have to[/I] disallow retries if you call for checks when there’s no consequence for failure. Because otherwise the roll would be literally nothing but a waste of time. By disallowing retries, what you’re doing is [I]introducing[/I] a consequence for failure. That consequence being that success becomes impossible. That keeps the roll from being pointless, but it doesn’t actually make “nothing happens” an interesting outcome. Add in a guard who might find you if you take too long, now we have some actual dramatic stakes! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you use the Success w/ Complication Module in the DMG or Fail Forward in the Basic PDF
Top