Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you want gnomes in the first phb?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyeshet" data-source="post: 3730488" data-attributes="member: 18363"><p>For me the iconic gnome will always be "David the Gnome" - something the PHB version has never even attempted to re-create. Its version, to me, has always seemed more along the lines of a magical halfling instead. So, if the Gnome is to be as it has been in 3e, then I wouldn't mind dropping it until the PHB2 comes out in '09. </p><p></p><p>Now, if they re-create the gnome to be a tiny sized humanoid or fey with a wisdom bonus, greater than normal speed for their size, and the ability to communicate with animals (even if only via Wild Empathy or something similar to that, as a racial ability), then I might be willing to accept them in the PHB. But I do not see that happening, as apparently they have been half sized magical humans for at least two editions so far, and as such tradition will likely dictate that they remain such for the time being. So, no, I do not wish to see them in the 4e PHB 1. In PHB 2, however, I could likely accept them. </p><p></p><p>I also wouldn't mind if the Tiefling (and its good counterpart) were similarly withheld until the PHB2 comes out, but it seems oddly more likely that a partial fiend (rather than a magical halfling) will be a common race in the default 4e presumed setting. All I can say is that if I decide to DM 4e, tieflings will likely not be allowed as a player race unless there is a major story / quest important reason for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyeshet, post: 3730488, member: 18363"] For me the iconic gnome will always be "David the Gnome" - something the PHB version has never even attempted to re-create. Its version, to me, has always seemed more along the lines of a magical halfling instead. So, if the Gnome is to be as it has been in 3e, then I wouldn't mind dropping it until the PHB2 comes out in '09. Now, if they re-create the gnome to be a tiny sized humanoid or fey with a wisdom bonus, greater than normal speed for their size, and the ability to communicate with animals (even if only via Wild Empathy or something similar to that, as a racial ability), then I might be willing to accept them in the PHB. But I do not see that happening, as apparently they have been half sized magical humans for at least two editions so far, and as such tradition will likely dictate that they remain such for the time being. So, no, I do not wish to see them in the 4e PHB 1. In PHB 2, however, I could likely accept them. I also wouldn't mind if the Tiefling (and its good counterpart) were similarly withheld until the PHB2 comes out, but it seems oddly more likely that a partial fiend (rather than a magical halfling) will be a common race in the default 4e presumed setting. All I can say is that if I decide to DM 4e, tieflings will likely not be allowed as a player race unless there is a major story / quest important reason for it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you want gnomes in the first phb?
Top