Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TwinBahamut" data-source="post: 3729271" data-attributes="member: 32536">Well, I think it would be hypocritical of me to say tieflings shouldn't be core, since the first D&amp;D character I played a long-running campaign with was a changeling warlock with a fiendish connection. Not a tiefling, but close. Chaotic neutral &quot;destroy darkness with darkness&quot; type, secretive, a bit angsty at times...At least tiefings are more interesting than a strange elf-subrace that gets too much attention. Drow just seem boring and one-dimensional to me. Also, I have a general liking for the idea of a culture which exists entirely as a subset of some larger culture, rather than being something seperate, and planetouched characters fill that somewhat.I would like to have assimar in as well though, if tieflings are core.Of course, the names tiefling and aasimar are terrible, so if they are core, I would prefer them to use a better name. Even &quot;demon-kin&quot; would work better.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TwinBahamut, post: 3729271, member: 32536"] Well, I think it would be hypocritical of me to say tieflings shouldn't be core, since the first D&D character I played a long-running campaign with was a changeling warlock with a fiendish connection. Not a tiefling, but close. Chaotic neutral "destroy darkness with darkness" type, secretive, a bit angsty at times... At least tiefings are more interesting than a strange elf-subrace that gets too much attention. Drow just seem boring and one-dimensional to me. Also, I have a general liking for the idea of a culture which exists entirely as a subset of some larger culture, rather than being something seperate, and planetouched characters fill that somewhat. I would like to have assimar in as well though, if tieflings are core. Of course, the names tiefling and aasimar are terrible, so if they are core, I would prefer them to use a better name. Even "demon-kin" would work better. [/QUOTE]

Verification