Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you want variety or bonuses in your feats?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5600142" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Exact that his comment was in the context of this discussion. </p><p> </p><p>He feels that the current offering of feats - both numerically potent combat feats and other more flavorful feats - presents players with a problematic choice between the two. He, himself, gives as example his own difficulty - if presented with effective combat feats, he will take them, rather than feeling like he is intentionally crippling his own character. </p><p> </p><p>At this point, you suggest that the problem is not the system, but his own personal failings and or style of play. You go on to also suggest - or rather, insist - that the specific issue of Expertise (which is only a small part of the overall discussion, <em>even Kzach's own post</em>) will not be fixed during the lifespan of 4E, and so the entire discussion is not even worth having. </p><p> </p><p>Look, I do get that you feel his focus on optimization vs non-optimization is part of the problem, and that if players could just get past that mindset, they wouldn't feel these issues are problematic. </p><p> </p><p>But the fault still lies, ultimately, with the system that presents this dilemma. You can't expect every player to get into some sort of zen mindstate, or every DM to be an expert analyst able to adjust the game to perfectly fit their group. Kzach isn't at fault for wanting to play an effective character while also playing a flavorful one, nor is he at fault for feeling that the current system makes it difficult to do so. </p><p> </p><p>Nor, ultimately, is the discussion not worth having regardless of whether WotC will or will not errata Expertise. Whether in the context of home games, 5th Edition, or simply helping inform others about the game, it is a reasonable discussion to have and a reasonable one for Kzach to take part in.</p><p> </p><p>And, honestly? Errata could happen. Again, I don't think it likely - but they've shown a willingness to make updates that they think they improve the game. Some large, some small. I don't think an abrupt shift away from the Expertise paradigm is likely, but I also don't think it is anything close to impossible, either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5600142, member: 61155"] Exact that his comment was in the context of this discussion. He feels that the current offering of feats - both numerically potent combat feats and other more flavorful feats - presents players with a problematic choice between the two. He, himself, gives as example his own difficulty - if presented with effective combat feats, he will take them, rather than feeling like he is intentionally crippling his own character. At this point, you suggest that the problem is not the system, but his own personal failings and or style of play. You go on to also suggest - or rather, insist - that the specific issue of Expertise (which is only a small part of the overall discussion, [I]even Kzach's own post[/I]) will not be fixed during the lifespan of 4E, and so the entire discussion is not even worth having. Look, I do get that you feel his focus on optimization vs non-optimization is part of the problem, and that if players could just get past that mindset, they wouldn't feel these issues are problematic. But the fault still lies, ultimately, with the system that presents this dilemma. You can't expect every player to get into some sort of zen mindstate, or every DM to be an expert analyst able to adjust the game to perfectly fit their group. Kzach isn't at fault for wanting to play an effective character while also playing a flavorful one, nor is he at fault for feeling that the current system makes it difficult to do so. Nor, ultimately, is the discussion not worth having regardless of whether WotC will or will not errata Expertise. Whether in the context of home games, 5th Edition, or simply helping inform others about the game, it is a reasonable discussion to have and a reasonable one for Kzach to take part in. And, honestly? Errata could happen. Again, I don't think it likely - but they've shown a willingness to make updates that they think they improve the game. Some large, some small. I don't think an abrupt shift away from the Expertise paradigm is likely, but I also don't think it is anything close to impossible, either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do you want variety or bonuses in your feats?
Top