Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 7652520" data-attributes="member: 6668292">I didn't feel like it was out of context, but I'm sorry it came across that way. You seemed to explicitly say how someone else would feel if they didn't play in your theoretical style. That is what I was responding to. Sorry for any offense.So it's not a game I'd want to play long term, but it'd be fun for one-shots, maybe. I like branching into other styles in the short term.Um, it's still play style, to me. Pretty clearly play style, at that. I'm totally okay with giving up convenient bonuses if it helps me immerse in the game. And for me, that has meant knowing my character's history, equipment, etc.I also understand I'd be giving up mechanical advancement. I might even do that, if it meant I'd be able to play long term with a group of people I liked. I most certainly couldn't play long term if I accepted your background method, so I might accept being level 1 forever just to play, provided I liked the group. To me, it's better than the alternative.Cool, no worries, then. I thought you were saying I'd have less fun if I didn't do things your way. If that's not what you meant, then we're good. I'm glad you like your thing, man, and I have no problem with you advocating it. Lots of other people like your method, and many others out there. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification