Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MadScientist" data-source="post: 1010321" data-attributes="member: 5277">I have to admit I haven't looked at it that closely. How does it compare to WF or PBS for increasing damage inflicted over the course of a campaign? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  It just seems that in general the designers of the core rules valued a +1 Atk and +1 AC pretty equally in other parts of the game. If you assume that half of the value of a +1 weapon is in the atk bonus and the other half is in the damage bonus, it works out his way for magic weapons and armor. Spells are a little all over the place as far as this is concerned though (Magic vestmant and GMW scale the same, but there seem to be more AC boosting spells out there than atk boosters). There aslo seem to be less stackable atk bonuses out there than AC bonuses, in terms of magic items. I haven't done an extensive survey, so I guess I could be wrong on some of these things.....</blockquote>