Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does “Whack-A-Mole” Healing really happen in games?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 8157492" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>I disagree.</p><p></p><p>You mention losing the fighter's turn.</p><p></p><p>If the monster is still threatening the location of the fighter, a cleric taking a turn to heal means losing the cleric's damage output (effectively losing a turn) while also failing to negate the threat. This means a possible net loss of 2 turns, rather than the fighter's 1 turn.</p><p></p><p>For similar reasons (if forced into a choice of one or the other,) modern combat troops are taught to negate/eliminate a threat rather than having a medic (for an example) run out to start triage on someone wounded by an enemy.</p><p></p><p>Dead enemies cease to have combat ability.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Additionally, there are other things to consider in the context of D&D.</p><p></p><p>Standing up a PC while they're still in danger means that they again become a target. Now, as a target close to 0, the PC is in danger of insta-death rules if hit and driven into the negatives.</p><p></p><p>Also, being that a healed PC becomes stabilized, the downside to waiting to heal is often less than the downside of the cleric spending several turns healing the ally. </p><p></p><p>Hypothetically, the DM could start to target the downed PC, but that still leads to an overall net benefit to the PCs because it means the enemy is effectively wasting a turn to hurt someone who can pop right back up after healing -meaning the enemy has 0 damage output against the rest of the party, while taking a round of damage from the party.</p><p></p><p>There may be cases in which standing up the downed PC is tactically better (such as healing the paladin so they can get up and do radiant damage to a foe weak to it). In those cases, healing the PC is the better option. However, in a vacuum (and absent specific circumstances which would indicate otherwise,) I would argue that it's better action economy and more tactically sound to mitigate the threat before turning to healing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 8157492, member: 58416"] I disagree. You mention losing the fighter's turn. If the monster is still threatening the location of the fighter, a cleric taking a turn to heal means losing the cleric's damage output (effectively losing a turn) while also failing to negate the threat. This means a possible net loss of 2 turns, rather than the fighter's 1 turn. For similar reasons (if forced into a choice of one or the other,) modern combat troops are taught to negate/eliminate a threat rather than having a medic (for an example) run out to start triage on someone wounded by an enemy. Dead enemies cease to have combat ability. Edit: Additionally, there are other things to consider in the context of D&D. Standing up a PC while they're still in danger means that they again become a target. Now, as a target close to 0, the PC is in danger of insta-death rules if hit and driven into the negatives. Also, being that a healed PC becomes stabilized, the downside to waiting to heal is often less than the downside of the cleric spending several turns healing the ally. Hypothetically, the DM could start to target the downed PC, but that still leads to an overall net benefit to the PCs because it means the enemy is effectively wasting a turn to hurt someone who can pop right back up after healing -meaning the enemy has 0 damage output against the rest of the party, while taking a round of damage from the party. There may be cases in which standing up the downed PC is tactically better (such as healing the paladin so they can get up and do radiant damage to a foe weak to it). In those cases, healing the PC is the better option. However, in a vacuum (and absent specific circumstances which would indicate otherwise,) I would argue that it's better action economy and more tactically sound to mitigate the threat before turning to healing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does “Whack-A-Mole” Healing really happen in games?
Top