Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 3094940" data-attributes="member: 22779">Oh, I fully agree that the issue came up at someone's table.  But, by and large, everyone else discussing the issue on the internet probably have never seen it come up at their's.  Take the monk and Improved Natural Weapons discussion - a hot button topic.  Considering monks are one of the least played classes according to the polls on the matter, it is very, very likely that this issue never comes up in the majority of games out there.  And, even in games with a monk, some will not want to take the feat (or know it exists), meaning it doesn't come up there as well.Ok, the 3 9's was a number I pulled from my vas deferens, but, it still makes my point.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />To be brutally honest, one of the things that I noticed playing 3e was has much quieter my games have gotten.  Thinking about it, the last major rule dispute I had was a few years ago when both me and the player were actually wrong.  He felt that you couldn't use dispel magic as a counterspell, I was wrong in that I thought you could do so from any range.  Sigh.  Although, this did result in a houserule where dispel magic was changed to a long range spell in order to protect ships from extended fireballs.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification