Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does 3E/3.5 dictate a certain style of play?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3270853" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Pick a CR 10 foe. Show me your CR 20 wizard. I guarantee that I can write an encounter using your foe and your wizard that is challenging. And, I bet, so can 90% of the people on EN World. I am not the only one here who has made changes to the baseline. I assume that the average person here can do the same. That isn't arrogance; that's an assumption of standard competence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Um.....You are aware of the difference between a creature's Challenge Rating and the Encounter Level of an encounter that might feature said creature, aren't you? If not, that might explain why you can't create an challenging encounter for a lvl 20 character using a CR 10 foe. </p><p></p><p>If you meant to say that an <em>EL 10 encounter</em> isn't challenging to a <em>party of lvl 20 characters</em> then...<strong><em>so long as you change the meaning of the term "EL" to match any adjustments to the relative power of lvl 20 characters</em></strong>....you are correct <em>by definition</em>.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: The obvious exception, of course, is when the EL 10 encounter is part of a series of encounters, and the character is drained due to previous encounters to the point where the EL 10 encounter is challenging.</p><p></p><p>It would also explain comments like "you have made the fundamental mistake of changing the nature of the challenge without realizing you have done so."</p><p></p><p>No. I realize that I have done so. What you fail to realize is that the advantages of specialization are not absolute, given any campaign environment in which conditions exist that can limit the specialist in his trade.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you'd like to make this argument, you can use a wizard as base class, and at each level see what benefits are gained from taking either a wizard or a fighter level. Then you could start as a fighter and see what benefits are gained at each level by taking a barbarian level. For my purposes, the first six levels would be sufficient for you to demonstrate your point.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 3270853, member: 18280"] Pick a CR 10 foe. Show me your CR 20 wizard. I guarantee that I can write an encounter using your foe and your wizard that is challenging. And, I bet, so can 90% of the people on EN World. I am not the only one here who has made changes to the baseline. I assume that the average person here can do the same. That isn't arrogance; that's an assumption of standard competence. Um.....You are aware of the difference between a creature's Challenge Rating and the Encounter Level of an encounter that might feature said creature, aren't you? If not, that might explain why you can't create an challenging encounter for a lvl 20 character using a CR 10 foe. If you meant to say that an [i]EL 10 encounter[/i] isn't challenging to a [i]party of lvl 20 characters[/i] then...[b][i]so long as you change the meaning of the term "EL" to match any adjustments to the relative power of lvl 20 characters[/i][/b]....you are correct [i]by definition[/i]. EDIT: The obvious exception, of course, is when the EL 10 encounter is part of a series of encounters, and the character is drained due to previous encounters to the point where the EL 10 encounter is challenging. It would also explain comments like "you have made the fundamental mistake of changing the nature of the challenge without realizing you have done so." No. I realize that I have done so. What you fail to realize is that the advantages of specialization are not absolute, given any campaign environment in which conditions exist that can limit the specialist in his trade. If you'd like to make this argument, you can use a wizard as base class, and at each level see what benefits are gained from taking either a wizard or a fighter level. Then you could start as a fighter and see what benefits are gained at each level by taking a barbarian level. For my purposes, the first six levels would be sufficient for you to demonstrate your point. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does 3E/3.5 dictate a certain style of play?
Top