Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4670614" data-attributes="member: 710">Yes, it could. But it can also be handled with more detail. Tell me how these details look in your non-combat scenario!Rogue and Ranger utilty powers seem to be full of this, other classes are more mixed. But I think it would be neat to have a specific &quot;non-combat&quot; power system for characters. Assuming both skills apply to the challenge. But what I really need now is: More details. How would such a system look like? Would it be &quot;Wizard cast Charm Person&quot; vs &quot;Rogue uses Diplomacy&quot;? Or is it something else? I don't quite understand what you think this could look like. Give me some example scenarios or special abilities! (I am assuming you have some idea, because otherwise whatever you wish might simply not be possible?) Give me an example of another game system, if necessary.What did 4E take away?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4670614, member: 710"] Yes, it could. But it can also be handled with more detail. Tell me how these details look in your non-combat scenario! Rogue and Ranger utilty powers seem to be full of this, other classes are more mixed. But I think it would be neat to have a specific "non-combat" power system for characters. Assuming both skills apply to the challenge. But what I really need now is: More details. How would such a system look like? Would it be "Wizard cast Charm Person" vs "Rogue uses Diplomacy"? Or is it something else? I don't quite understand what you think this could look like. Give me some example scenarios or special abilities! (I am assuming you have some idea, because otherwise whatever you wish might simply not be possible?) Give me an example of another game system, if necessary. What did 4E take away? [/QUOTE]

Verification