Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hopeless" data-source="post: 3818233" data-attributes="member: 36349">Is 4e d&d more d&dish than 3e?Don't know, personally I thought 3.0 was better than 3.5 but thats because there was less books to worry about and I could use the vancian system for the psionic rules and make them work much better than what they come up with.Bought 3.5 and then Eberron mostly out of curiousity though Eberron is whats keeping my interest, that is until 4e was announced.Actually didn't find the teaser video that bad, would have preferred they at least demonstrated what they had developed so far, the backwards compatibility is one problem they really should have considered but it looks like they really want people to buy 4e and 4e part 2, 3,4,5 etc..I don't care for tieflings becoming core, and absolutely loathe the idea of warlocks since I still think the one area they really messed up in 3e was downplaying sorcerors instead of making them a true character class instead of leaving most dms I've played with the absurd idea that they're a sub class of wizard when it should have been made clear they're not.Sorry but the news about Faerun has given me an idea on how to explain why tieflings can be core and warlocks are the new class for the bad guys and not pcs unless they're evil aligned PERIOD.So it comes down to the simple fact we'll have to wait and see... and pray for the best even if the podcasts make me think they're morons...</blockquote>