Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Xylix" data-source="post: 504271" data-attributes="member: 9089">LOL&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Flesh to Stone is already addressed.&nbsp; And flesh to stone does not kill, it just turns you to stone <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />It says so in the book.&nbsp; Not a death spell.Holy word banishes.&nbsp; It doesn't kill, how can it be a death spell....Disitegrate I have approached about 5x now, quote what I said, tear it apart and we will talk again.Yep, looked it up myself.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Also completely agreedYou Forgotd) Death Spells without the death descriptorWhich would be Phantasmal killer&nbsp; which would be in the circle of&nbsp; 'magical death effects'Convience, makes looking around easier.&nbsp;&nbsp; Same reason for sticking 'illusion' or etc... on.&nbsp;&nbsp; Perhaps to make some death spells more visible....Label those 'death spells' which you cannot recover with slay living&nbsp; (which ironically would only be Phantasmal killer even if you DID include disintegrate&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; )Plenty of reasons.&nbsp; Same reason I do similar things when I design my own systems.*Chuckle*&nbsp; that depends on how you interpert a particular sentance.&nbsp; If you interpert it my way YOUR argument does not hold water.&nbsp; What is really funny is only Caliban has bothered to show YOUR point of view holds water.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />To convince me it doesn't hold water show that my interpetation of this does not hold water.I labeled my premesies now go attack them.&nbsp; &nbsp; Just like I did Caliban's premises.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Xylix, post: 504271, member: 9089"] LOL ;) Flesh to Stone is already addressed. And flesh to stone does not kill, it just turns you to stone ;) It says so in the book. Not a death spell. Holy word banishes. It doesn't kill, how can it be a death spell.... Disitegrate I have approached about 5x now, quote what I said, tear it apart and we will talk again. Yep, looked it up myself. :) Also completely agreed You Forgot d) Death Spells without the death descriptor Which would be Phantasmal killer which would be in the circle of 'magical death effects' Convience, makes looking around easier. Same reason for sticking 'illusion' or etc... on. Perhaps to make some death spells more visible.... Label those 'death spells' which you cannot recover with slay living (which ironically would only be Phantasmal killer even if you DID include disintegrate ;) ) Plenty of reasons. Same reason I do similar things when I design my own systems. *Chuckle* that depends on how you interpert a particular sentance. If you interpert it my way YOUR argument does not hold water. What is really funny is only Caliban has bothered to show YOUR point of view holds water. ;) To convince me it doesn't hold water show that my interpetation of this does not hold water. I labeled my premesies now go attack them. Just like I did Caliban's premises. [/QUOTE]

Verification