Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Blacksad" data-source="post: 115589" data-attributes="member: 1359">That's exactly what I propose!I liked Sigil but my player feared to go in it due to the presence of the overzealous lawful faction and strange lingo, though they didn't mind going in the nine hell<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />, I have always considered the cant and faction a Sigil thing, and was a bit disapointed when the inner-plane book had a lot of the places of interest linked to different faction, though it didn't use a cant (it was mostly native that described their environment, so no cant here).Nonetheless the Planescape style might work.Something that the designer once said was that some books like faces of evil (or faces of fiends?) a very good book on fiends wasn't a seller due to the planescape logo (I haven't this book, I'll probably buy it if it is available as an ESD, so Psion could you please tell a bit of what was in this book, it might interest people who only get the first boxed set and think planescape is only that, and say if it use a lot of cant).Latter they released planar book, same design as the planescape book minus faction and the Planescape logo: warriors of heaven, legion of hells, and vortex of madness, and they said (but I think it was on the old WotC board so it doesn't really help) that those book sold a lot more (and warriors of heaven isn't even close to an average product), so the Planescape-style might be ok for you if they don't use the cant (i.e. it is always in an open ended fashion that allow the DM to customize as he likes, with opposed belief and other things, you could see such an example in the above post with the spire from the neutral plane).</blockquote>

Verification