Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cbas10" data-source="post: 1260095" data-attributes="member: 6459">First: that is by far NOT an "invlunerable combo."  Any competent wizard should have at least one scroll handy that would either cancel or see through the invisibility.  Any wizard who does not take advantage of his free Scribe Scroll feat deserves to die on the pointy end of a kobold spear, anyways.  Additionally, why would a wizard memorize such killer combos EVERY day?  Does he have no life?  Or does the DM assume that the only antagonist spellcasters are insane wizards and sorcerers with nothing else to do except wait in towers and dungeons with arsenals of killin-n-destroyin spells?A lot of times, good ol' brain power cancels anything out there, though.  You are not doing well, here...proving magic is a crutch.Why do I feel like we are discussing a video game more than D&D?I won't argue about the supposed end-all, be-all invincibility of Invisibility spells (or in this case, Greater Invisibility), as this is not the topic to do so {Edit: okay....maybe I will be tackling this; I'm feeling far too precocious to pass up something so absurd}.  However, this tactic has nothing to do with the availability of magic items in a given setting or campaign.  Everything you are talking about can be countered by regular characters and their natural abilities (class features, spells, etc).  What does any of this have to do with the number of magical items available for player characters to find or buy in a game?</blockquote>

Verification