Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else feel like the action economy and the way actions work in general in 5e both just suck?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 7941538" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>.</p><p></p><p>millions of people manage to wrangle the complexities of things like baking things from a recipe or memory, driving a car or truck, & many more. I'd say navigate through TSA but usefulness is a debatable problem with that one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes I already pointed out evidence for the need of those options in the form of wotc not removing them entirely, I'll go one further & point out how even though fate uses zones rather than a grid... even fate includes a section on moving around when there is someone or something is preventing you from doing so with situation aspects & it's movement rules. Fate is about as rules light as it gets.</p><p></p><p>More importantly you ignored the fact that I questioned you on the fact that you actually asked why a variant rule needs to work in isolation without needing the gm to finish it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you incapable of addressing points raised by anyone?... You are going back to why should someone have the nerve to expect a variant rule to fill the need they present themself as being a solution for rather than admit multiple unfinished rules wasting pagespace could have been used for one complete variant rule for literally <em>anything e</em>lse?... that should be like managing to pass a 10foot high <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=limbo+party+game&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjE-M2Z9ZfoAhWP3FkKHQ28DkcQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=limbo+party+game&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l2.9304.10231..10522...0.0..0.116.478.4j1......0....1..gws-wiz-img.......0i7i30j0i8i7i30.00k0XU4O7XI&ei=zrprXsTZJo-55wKN-Lq4BA&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS859US859" target="_blank">limbo pole</a>. </p><p></p><p>It seems like your argument is in the process of morphing to "why should positioning rules that give benefits for certain positions not include any cost or effort to obtaining those positions" but you aren't willing to say such an absurd statement, is that correct?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 7941538, member: 93670"] . millions of people manage to wrangle the complexities of things like baking things from a recipe or memory, driving a car or truck, & many more. I'd say navigate through TSA but usefulness is a debatable problem with that one. Yes I already pointed out evidence for the need of those options in the form of wotc not removing them entirely, I'll go one further & point out how even though fate uses zones rather than a grid... even fate includes a section on moving around when there is someone or something is preventing you from doing so with situation aspects & it's movement rules. Fate is about as rules light as it gets. More importantly you ignored the fact that I questioned you on the fact that you actually asked why a variant rule needs to work in isolation without needing the gm to finish it. Are you incapable of addressing points raised by anyone?... You are going back to why should someone have the nerve to expect a variant rule to fill the need they present themself as being a solution for rather than admit multiple unfinished rules wasting pagespace could have been used for one complete variant rule for literally [I]anything e[/I]lse?... that should be like managing to pass a 10foot high [URL='https://www.google.com/search?q=limbo+party+game&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjE-M2Z9ZfoAhWP3FkKHQ28DkcQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=limbo+party+game&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l2.9304.10231..10522...0.0..0.116.478.4j1......0....1..gws-wiz-img.......0i7i30j0i8i7i30.00k0XU4O7XI&ei=zrprXsTZJo-55wKN-Lq4BA&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS859US859']limbo pole[/URL]. It seems like your argument is in the process of morphing to "why should positioning rules that give benefits for certain positions not include any cost or effort to obtaining those positions" but you aren't willing to say such an absurd statement, is that correct? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else feel like the action economy and the way actions work in general in 5e both just suck?
Top