Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else think that 1D&D will create a significant divide in the community?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 8819182" data-attributes="member: 7035894"><p>I think there has to be a democratic element to what is good design, if you are a publisher. In other words, I don't think it's a cop out to say that, objectively, good design is what the most people like. Because as many have pointed out, <em>no design</em> will please everyone. There is no perfect game. But you can get a pretty good sense of whether the design is broadly good or bad based on players reaction. From this perspective, 4e was clearly bad design - it was responsible for Pathfinder (i.e. D&D 3.5 continued) briefly becoming the market leader until 5e was rushed out to course correct.</p><p></p><p>5e was specifically designed and heavily play-tested to go back to the roots of D&D, simplified into the d20 system, and to not overcomplicate things so that the emphasis is more on story than rules. 5e is pretty much what I wanted back when I first started playing AD&D. I think WotC has pretty much solved what makes a great D&D game. And they think so too. That's why they don't want a new edition. They are recognizing that there are tweaks that will happen here and there as culture evolves and ideas from players and from other game systems slowly percolate, but they don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.</p><p></p><p>And WotC aren't idiots. They know that to the established D&D fan base, the word "edition" means one thing: you're expected to throw out the old books and buy new ones if you want to keep up. They don't want that, precisely because it will create a schism, exactly like what happened with 4e when they harpooned their own brand. They would rather sell you more books over many years than go for the quick money grab of the old editions model that always fed into a boom/bust cycle.</p><p></p><p>So many folks here are basically just being pedantic and arguing about what the word edition means as if that is objectively meaningful. It isn't. Words only have meaning in context, and in the context of the history of D&D the word "editions" has come to mean something that WotC doesn't want to do anymore. <em>They want you to be able to keep using your 2014 PHB and still feel comfortable buying new sourcebooks and adventures.</em> It's as simple as that. Yes, there will be an updated PHB for those who want it, but it is not going to change any of the fundamentals of 5e. You will be able to purchase the new PHB and still run the old "Lost Mines of Phandelver" if that's your thing, or you will be able to buy the upcoming <em>Phandelver</em> adventure book and run it with your 2014 PHB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clint_L, post: 8819182, member: 7035894"] I think there has to be a democratic element to what is good design, if you are a publisher. In other words, I don't think it's a cop out to say that, objectively, good design is what the most people like. Because as many have pointed out, [I]no design[/I] will please everyone. There is no perfect game. But you can get a pretty good sense of whether the design is broadly good or bad based on players reaction. From this perspective, 4e was clearly bad design - it was responsible for Pathfinder (i.e. D&D 3.5 continued) briefly becoming the market leader until 5e was rushed out to course correct. 5e was specifically designed and heavily play-tested to go back to the roots of D&D, simplified into the d20 system, and to not overcomplicate things so that the emphasis is more on story than rules. 5e is pretty much what I wanted back when I first started playing AD&D. I think WotC has pretty much solved what makes a great D&D game. And they think so too. That's why they don't want a new edition. They are recognizing that there are tweaks that will happen here and there as culture evolves and ideas from players and from other game systems slowly percolate, but they don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water. And WotC aren't idiots. They know that to the established D&D fan base, the word "edition" means one thing: you're expected to throw out the old books and buy new ones if you want to keep up. They don't want that, precisely because it will create a schism, exactly like what happened with 4e when they harpooned their own brand. They would rather sell you more books over many years than go for the quick money grab of the old editions model that always fed into a boom/bust cycle. So many folks here are basically just being pedantic and arguing about what the word edition means as if that is objectively meaningful. It isn't. Words only have meaning in context, and in the context of the history of D&D the word "editions" has come to mean something that WotC doesn't want to do anymore. [I]They want you to be able to keep using your 2014 PHB and still feel comfortable buying new sourcebooks and adventures.[/I] It's as simple as that. Yes, there will be an updated PHB for those who want it, but it is not going to change any of the fundamentals of 5e. You will be able to purchase the new PHB and still run the old "Lost Mines of Phandelver" if that's your thing, or you will be able to buy the upcoming [I]Phandelver[/I] adventure book and run it with your 2014 PHB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else think that 1D&D will create a significant divide in the community?
Top