Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 8820568" data-attributes="member: 5142">&quot;All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, when was the last time that games were patched across a 10 year life cycle?&quot;&nbsp; But yes, once we ignore the buttloads of inconvenient exceptions, your point is correct. Regardless of how many Diablo games we have gotten since 2000, Diablo 2 was patched until 2016. Sixteen years. How many Diablos in that time frame? One. It was released in 2012. So still twelve years of patching. And for the record, both 12 and 16 are more than 10, which was your original goal post that you put forth. The mainstream market shows that the existence of sequels doesn't preclude older games from being updated and patched by the company as well. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 8820568, member: 5142"] "All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, when was the last time that games were patched across a 10 year life cycle?" But yes, once we ignore the buttloads of inconvenient exceptions, your point is correct. Regardless of how many Diablo games we have gotten since 2000, Diablo 2 was patched until 2016. Sixteen years. How many Diablos in that time frame? One. It was released in 2012. So still twelve years of patching. And for the record, both 12 and 16 are more than 10, which was your original goal post that you put forth. The mainstream market shows that the existence of sequels doesn't preclude older games from being updated and patched by the company as well. 🤷‍♂️ [/QUOTE]

Verification