Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else think that 1D&D will create a significant divide in the community?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8960719" data-attributes="member: 7034611"><p>There were maybe 4 people replying to you ands they all had the same take on the questions you were asking</p><p></p><p>Let's say for the sake of the argument that there are more and they get shouted down, that still means they are a small minority, otherwise the shouting down would not be possible / go the other way</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I gave what I consider a very simple rule of thumb, any table can of course do things differently, but the rule is easy to follow and the other replies to your questions independently used the same rule</p><p></p><p>1) use the char-independent rules from one 'edition' (e.g. conditions)</p><p>2) use chars (race, class, subclass, feats, ...) from one 'edition' for one char but allow chars from either 'edition' at the table. So a 2014 char uses the 2014 races, classes, subclasses, feats, etc. the 2024 char uses 2024 content exclusively, no mixing and matching</p><p></p><p>This is very simple to follow and only needs some minor edge cases to be resolved</p><p></p><p></p><p>no, that just means the rules are not identical, it says nothing about compatibility. Heck Tasha's racial bonus rules are different from the PHB ones, does that mean the two are not compatible books? If so, why has no one brought this up in the last 3 or so years....</p><p></p><p></p><p>no one said 2e is compatible with 5e, so off to a good start... you also do mix and match (you take a 5e race, the 5e spells but the 2e spell slots...) so this is whacky, but I do not consider it much of an example for what we were saying. Sure, you can houserule anything, but there is no compatibility between a 2e char and a 5e char, you had to houserule a lot (and did) to get any semblance of that.</p><p>The whole point of compatibility is that this is not needed, if you do it anyway, that is your prerogative.</p><p></p><p>So basically you did everything you did in any of your posts and none of what everyone else said you should be doing in the replies to your questions (see my rules of thumb). To me this just shows that you do not really care what anyone says and the questions you asked were just rhetorical.</p><p></p><p>Sure, you can create an amalgamation and make it work, but compatibility means you do not need to do so. Incompatibility means you have to in order to make it work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mamba, post: 8960719, member: 7034611"] There were maybe 4 people replying to you ands they all had the same take on the questions you were asking Let's say for the sake of the argument that there are more and they get shouted down, that still means they are a small minority, otherwise the shouting down would not be possible / go the other way I gave what I consider a very simple rule of thumb, any table can of course do things differently, but the rule is easy to follow and the other replies to your questions independently used the same rule 1) use the char-independent rules from one 'edition' (e.g. conditions) 2) use chars (race, class, subclass, feats, ...) from one 'edition' for one char but allow chars from either 'edition' at the table. So a 2014 char uses the 2014 races, classes, subclasses, feats, etc. the 2024 char uses 2024 content exclusively, no mixing and matching This is very simple to follow and only needs some minor edge cases to be resolved no, that just means the rules are not identical, it says nothing about compatibility. Heck Tasha's racial bonus rules are different from the PHB ones, does that mean the two are not compatible books? If so, why has no one brought this up in the last 3 or so years.... no one said 2e is compatible with 5e, so off to a good start... you also do mix and match (you take a 5e race, the 5e spells but the 2e spell slots...) so this is whacky, but I do not consider it much of an example for what we were saying. Sure, you can houserule anything, but there is no compatibility between a 2e char and a 5e char, you had to houserule a lot (and did) to get any semblance of that. The whole point of compatibility is that this is not needed, if you do it anyway, that is your prerogative. So basically you did everything you did in any of your posts and none of what everyone else said you should be doing in the replies to your questions (see my rules of thumb). To me this just shows that you do not really care what anyone says and the questions you asked were just rhetorical. Sure, you can create an amalgamation and make it work, but compatibility means you do not need to do so. Incompatibility means you have to in order to make it work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone else think that 1D&D will create a significant divide in the community?
Top