Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does anyone else think this is a bug in CB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5229601" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>The original point stands though, DIS requires a magical implement in the off hand. It gives a damage bonus equal to the enhancement bonus of the off hand implement, which in your case is 0. It may well be an unforeseen side effect of the inherent bonus system, but it exists. You could easily house rule it and in CB just give yourself a magic implement in that hand to make the numbers come out right. Inherent bonuses are an optional rule, they may not interact perfectly with every other part of the system.</p><p></p><p>I agree, optimizing strikers to increase their damage output can have a really significant impact, especially at mid-high paragon. Even so I would suspect that the other strikers you're comparing to are a bit sub-optimal. Another possibility is those players simply aren't doing a very good job. Are they coordinating their attacks with leaders to get to-hit bonuses? Do they exploit flanking? Do they take advantage of things like Prime Shot? A lot of the variation I've found comes from how the character is played. A good player should be able to do pretty well even with a striker with no special feats.</p><p></p><p>Heck, the other day I took a look at the character sheet for the level 10 starlock in the group I'm DMing for. This guy has NO feats that do anything for his damage output. The one feat he has that helps his DPR at all is Warrior of the Wild (gives him HQ once per encounter). He's still doing really excellent damage, and with a class that by reputation generally has a lousy damage output. He's just good at tactics. He's always taking advantage of leader bonuses etc. He's done a good job with his ability scores, picks good powers, uses them effectively, and just generally makes sure he's eeking every last drop out of his character. I guess he just really has better uses for his feats. I'm sure he could pump out a lot more damage if he'd take Expertise and DIS and Weapon Focus, but good play is at least as important as tweaking your build when it comes right down to it.</p><p></p><p>By comparison the rogue in the same party has all sorts of feats, Weapon Expertise, Weapon Focus, Backstabber, TWF, etc. That particular player honestly has just never quite grokked the 4e rogue. Her damage output is less than the fighter's most of the time. Lately she's been getting a little smarter, but I'm pretty sure in most fights she's done poor damage. The build of the character is fine. It may not be tweaked to the Nth degree but its a totally solid build. Its all in the play. The warlock stomps her on total damage output encounter after encounter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5229601, member: 82106"] The original point stands though, DIS requires a magical implement in the off hand. It gives a damage bonus equal to the enhancement bonus of the off hand implement, which in your case is 0. It may well be an unforeseen side effect of the inherent bonus system, but it exists. You could easily house rule it and in CB just give yourself a magic implement in that hand to make the numbers come out right. Inherent bonuses are an optional rule, they may not interact perfectly with every other part of the system. I agree, optimizing strikers to increase their damage output can have a really significant impact, especially at mid-high paragon. Even so I would suspect that the other strikers you're comparing to are a bit sub-optimal. Another possibility is those players simply aren't doing a very good job. Are they coordinating their attacks with leaders to get to-hit bonuses? Do they exploit flanking? Do they take advantage of things like Prime Shot? A lot of the variation I've found comes from how the character is played. A good player should be able to do pretty well even with a striker with no special feats. Heck, the other day I took a look at the character sheet for the level 10 starlock in the group I'm DMing for. This guy has NO feats that do anything for his damage output. The one feat he has that helps his DPR at all is Warrior of the Wild (gives him HQ once per encounter). He's still doing really excellent damage, and with a class that by reputation generally has a lousy damage output. He's just good at tactics. He's always taking advantage of leader bonuses etc. He's done a good job with his ability scores, picks good powers, uses them effectively, and just generally makes sure he's eeking every last drop out of his character. I guess he just really has better uses for his feats. I'm sure he could pump out a lot more damage if he'd take Expertise and DIS and Weapon Focus, but good play is at least as important as tweaking your build when it comes right down to it. By comparison the rogue in the same party has all sorts of feats, Weapon Expertise, Weapon Focus, Backstabber, TWF, etc. That particular player honestly has just never quite grokked the 4e rogue. Her damage output is less than the fighter's most of the time. Lately she's been getting a little smarter, but I'm pretty sure in most fights she's done poor damage. The build of the character is fine. It may not be tweaked to the Nth degree but its a totally solid build. Its all in the play. The warlock stomps her on total damage output encounter after encounter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does anyone else think this is a bug in CB?
Top