Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does anyone else think this is a bug in CB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 5232102" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>There exists no text to infer that 'staff' as a weapon group does not satisfy 'staff' as an implement requirement for those that have that. In fact, if you were to speak of inferences, the existance of 'light blade' and 'heavy blade' as implements indicate to a reasonable degree that a weapon group can also be an implement type. </p><p></p><p>This, of course, ignores the existence of such implement types as 'dagger' and 'weapon you're proficient with' which are also valid implement types.</p><p></p><p>Is there a single solitary piece of evidence to support your claim that a quarterstaff will not function as a staff implement despite being of the staff weapon group? Do you have a single iota of game rule text that would hint that 'staff' in the implements allowed entry of a character class excludes the weapon group of the same name?</p><p></p><p>Moreover, assuming said text exists, then implement types mentioned in class entries, if they cannot be refering to weapon groups even if called by name... where then is the list of implements a swordmage, sorcerer, or monk would use?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But where does it say, infer, or otherwise hint that Gandalf couldn't pick up donatello's staff and beat people with it?</p><p></p><p>That's the problem, you're making points involving rules text that simply does not exists, is not hinted at, and is not supported by precidents in the rules.</p><p></p><p>Fact: Weapon groups can be implement types.</p><p>Fact: Staff is a weapon group.</p><p>Fact: Quarterstaff is of the staff weapon group.</p><p>Fact: Zero text indicates that the staff weapon group and the staff implement type are not, in fact, the same concept.</p><p></p><p>What IS an exception is that you can have specific implement enchantments for staffs... however quarterstaffs still qualify for those enchantments.</p><p></p><p>-------------------------</p><p></p><p>More importantly, if quarterstaves could not be used as staffs for implement powers, then you'd get around that by using a staff implement anyways. The staff implement qualifies as a quarterstaff which means that all your feats that work with quarterstaffs still work with the staff implement. And... the cost in gold is exactly the same. So, in practice, you'll have two types of staff-users: Those using staff implements to do both without any penalty... so no one would be using a straight up quarterstaff because it would offer no advantage whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>So really, the 'quarterstaff is not a staff implement' is completely irrelevant even if it were true, because the staff implement IS a quarterstaff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 5232102, member: 71571"] There exists no text to infer that 'staff' as a weapon group does not satisfy 'staff' as an implement requirement for those that have that. In fact, if you were to speak of inferences, the existance of 'light blade' and 'heavy blade' as implements indicate to a reasonable degree that a weapon group can also be an implement type. This, of course, ignores the existence of such implement types as 'dagger' and 'weapon you're proficient with' which are also valid implement types. Is there a single solitary piece of evidence to support your claim that a quarterstaff will not function as a staff implement despite being of the staff weapon group? Do you have a single iota of game rule text that would hint that 'staff' in the implements allowed entry of a character class excludes the weapon group of the same name? Moreover, assuming said text exists, then implement types mentioned in class entries, if they cannot be refering to weapon groups even if called by name... where then is the list of implements a swordmage, sorcerer, or monk would use? But where does it say, infer, or otherwise hint that Gandalf couldn't pick up donatello's staff and beat people with it? That's the problem, you're making points involving rules text that simply does not exists, is not hinted at, and is not supported by precidents in the rules. Fact: Weapon groups can be implement types. Fact: Staff is a weapon group. Fact: Quarterstaff is of the staff weapon group. Fact: Zero text indicates that the staff weapon group and the staff implement type are not, in fact, the same concept. What IS an exception is that you can have specific implement enchantments for staffs... however quarterstaffs still qualify for those enchantments. ------------------------- More importantly, if quarterstaves could not be used as staffs for implement powers, then you'd get around that by using a staff implement anyways. The staff implement qualifies as a quarterstaff which means that all your feats that work with quarterstaffs still work with the staff implement. And... the cost in gold is exactly the same. So, in practice, you'll have two types of staff-users: Those using staff implements to do both without any penalty... so no one would be using a straight up quarterstaff because it would offer no advantage whatsoever. So really, the 'quarterstaff is not a staff implement' is completely irrelevant even if it were true, because the staff implement IS a quarterstaff. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does anyone else think this is a bug in CB?
Top