Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Anyone Find the Encumbrance Amounts Unrealistic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5926826" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>It seems to be a sub-mechanic designed with only ease of remembering and ease of play in mind, rather than also accounting for realism. A good amount of D&D mechanics have only this as their base, instead of also considering realism.</p><p> </p><p>I however believe that things can be realistic, and still be easy to remember and resolve, and also remain fun and flexible (easy to adapt) for other specific feels. It just takes keeping realism in mind as much as these other aspects. I've found that in general, it's usually easier to add, rather than subtract...and in this area even more so. Removing aspects of a system that are unrealistic is a very complicated endeavor...unless those aspects are already there. Then if one wants aspects with other feels, simply add them on or ignore "realistic" aspects in favor of something else.</p><p> </p><p>Unfortunately, too many designers don't do this...leading to the inevitable occurance of a player suddenly going <em>"Hey, wait a minute...that just doesn't seem right..."</em></p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5926826, member: 59506"] It seems to be a sub-mechanic designed with only ease of remembering and ease of play in mind, rather than also accounting for realism. A good amount of D&D mechanics have only this as their base, instead of also considering realism. I however believe that things can be realistic, and still be easy to remember and resolve, and also remain fun and flexible (easy to adapt) for other specific feels. It just takes keeping realism in mind as much as these other aspects. I've found that in general, it's usually easier to add, rather than subtract...and in this area even more so. Removing aspects of a system that are unrealistic is a very complicated endeavor...unless those aspects are already there. Then if one wants aspects with other feels, simply add them on or ignore "realistic" aspects in favor of something else. Unfortunately, too many designers don't do this...leading to the inevitable occurance of a player suddenly going [I]"Hey, wait a minute...that just doesn't seem right..."[/I] B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Anyone Find the Encumbrance Amounts Unrealistic?
Top