Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rooer" data-source="post: 293564" data-attributes="member: 6466">And I deserve to feel this way. I paid $30 for software that I am totally unhappy with.That's still no excuse for NOT including them in the list of monsters.&nbsp; Why not put them in both places?Actually, there are quite a few wands in the DMG in a nice little table, so no, you don't have to go and &quot;create&quot; it.In my experience, I don't generally let little things escape my notice,&nbsp; I also don't lambast something that doesn't deserve it.&nbsp; I assure you that I looked at what options were available. You're doing the assuming that I didn't know what I was looking at.&nbsp; I'm still correct in all my points.&nbsp; I didn't say they don't have a reason, they're just not enough to justify &quot;changing&quot; the MM.Eric, I loved your site, and I wish I could do what you ask, because I believe the only way a developer can make a better product is with feedback.&nbsp; I'd love to give feedback (with a little less feeling obviously).&nbsp; Yeah, I'm mad as heck I blew $30+ on this.&nbsp; But if they can make it better for everyone else that doesn't feel that way because I want a quality product, great.&nbsp; I'd gladly bring my points to them.&nbsp; But their forums don't seem to work (much like their program).And how can I point out so many BAD things about it (bugs or otherwise) in two hours of going through it than their QA (or lack there-of) couldn't find.&nbsp; No offense Eric, but if you were a Beta tester, I would have expected more out of this product.&nbsp; I know you're a stand-up guy that demands quality.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rooer, post: 293564, member: 6466"] And I deserve to feel this way. I paid $30 for software that I am totally unhappy with.That's still no excuse for NOT including them in the list of monsters. Why not put them in both places?Actually, there are quite a few wands in the DMG in a nice little table, so no, you don't have to go and "create" it.In my experience, I don't generally let little things escape my notice, I also don't lambast something that doesn't deserve it. I assure you that I looked at what options were available. You're doing the assuming that I didn't know what I was looking at. I'm still correct in all my points. I didn't say they don't have a reason, they're just not enough to justify "changing" the MM. Eric, I loved your site, and I wish I could do what you ask, because I believe the only way a developer can make a better product is with feedback. I'd love to give feedback (with a little less feeling obviously). Yeah, I'm mad as heck I blew $30+ on this. But if they can make it better for everyone else that doesn't feel that way because I want a quality product, great. I'd gladly bring my points to them. But their forums don't seem to work (much like their program). And how can I point out so many BAD things about it (bugs or otherwise) in two hours of going through it than their QA (or lack there-of) couldn't find. No offense Eric, but if you were a Beta tester, I would have expected more out of this product. I know you're a stand-up guy that demands quality. [/QUOTE]

Verification