Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone play 5e Perception rules as written?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 9394333" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>My hypothesis is no, they don’t. Certainly, I have not played in a game (or run one, tbh) in which the rules for perception have been followed as written. (I cannot think of a single time I have rolled Perception with disadvantage due to light levels alone.)</p><p></p><p>The rules I am thinking about involve the interaction of Darkvision, environmental lighting, and the Perception skill:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Areas of dim light are <u>lightly obscured</u>, and give disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks. [PHB 183]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Darkvision lets you see in dim light as in bright light, and in darkness as if you were in dim light. [PHB 184-85, and relevant race entries]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Therefore, anyone using Darkvision to see in the dark should make their Perception rolls with disadvantage (or have -5 to their passive perception).</li> </ul><p>It is a truism on these boards that Perception is “the best skill in the game” or “the god skill” (though there are some dissenters). I suggest that this belief persists because people do not suffer penalties for having darkvision when seeing in the dark.</p><p></p><p>Assuming an “average” DC 15 check, then, a character with 12 Wisdom and proficiency in Perception, would need to be at level 9 before they have a passive perception that would hit it in daylight; that would be a passive 10 for darkvision in the dark.</p><p></p><p>Yes At the same time, I think that there are consequences if these rules were played as written:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">having a high perception score would remain very valuable, but perhaps would not be seen as a necessary skill to take.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That's because even races with darkvision would spend more time establishing light sources routinely so that they can regularly hit “easy” DCs in dim light. That, in turn, means that the burden on the party of non-darkvision species is reduced.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the Skulker and Observant feats suddenly become more effective. I do not think I have seen anyone take Skulker in 10 years; nevertheless, its third bullet point (that dim light does not impose disadvantage) suddenly makes Darkvision really effective (i.e. exactly as effective as it has been in the play I have seen).<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Relevant to PHB 2024</strong>: I notice that in the playtest Skulker now gives Blindsight to 10’, and Observant doesn’t affect passive perception (the term isn’t used), but gives expertise on all Perception checks if you already have proficiency. Also, Darkvision is a defined term, and we haven’t been given its definition.</li> </ul></li> </ul><p>What are your thoughts? Do you play RAW? How does it work out?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 9394333, member: 23484"] My hypothesis is no, they don’t. Certainly, I have not played in a game (or run one, tbh) in which the rules for perception have been followed as written. (I cannot think of a single time I have rolled Perception with disadvantage due to light levels alone.) The rules I am thinking about involve the interaction of Darkvision, environmental lighting, and the Perception skill: [LIST] [*]Areas of dim light are [U]lightly obscured[/U], and give disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks. [PHB 183] [*]Darkvision lets you see in dim light as in bright light, and in darkness as if you were in dim light. [PHB 184-85, and relevant race entries] [*]Therefore, anyone using Darkvision to see in the dark should make their Perception rolls with disadvantage (or have -5 to their passive perception). [/LIST] It is a truism on these boards that Perception is “the best skill in the game” or “the god skill” (though there are some dissenters). I suggest that this belief persists because people do not suffer penalties for having darkvision when seeing in the dark. Assuming an “average” DC 15 check, then, a character with 12 Wisdom and proficiency in Perception, would need to be at level 9 before they have a passive perception that would hit it in daylight; that would be a passive 10 for darkvision in the dark. Yes At the same time, I think that there are consequences if these rules were played as written: [LIST] [*]having a high perception score would remain very valuable, but perhaps would not be seen as a necessary skill to take. [*]That's because even races with darkvision would spend more time establishing light sources routinely so that they can regularly hit “easy” DCs in dim light. That, in turn, means that the burden on the party of non-darkvision species is reduced. [*]the Skulker and Observant feats suddenly become more effective. I do not think I have seen anyone take Skulker in 10 years; nevertheless, its third bullet point (that dim light does not impose disadvantage) suddenly makes Darkvision really effective (i.e. exactly as effective as it has been in the play I have seen). [LIST] [*][B]Relevant to PHB 2024[/B]: I notice that in the playtest Skulker now gives Blindsight to 10’, and Observant doesn’t affect passive perception (the term isn’t used), but gives expertise on all Perception checks if you already have proficiency. Also, Darkvision is a defined term, and we haven’t been given its definition. [/LIST] [/LIST] What are your thoughts? Do you play RAW? How does it work out? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does anyone play 5e Perception rules as written?
Top