Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does being invis stop AoO?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RigaMortus" data-source="post: 691226" data-attributes="member: 1077"><p>Fair enough. Although I still disagree (until there is an official ruling, hopefully in 3.5 if not sooner) I found some evidence to support your theory.</p><p></p><p>I took a look at Aoo again, looking for anything which would support the theory that you need to perceive what your opponent is doing in order to make an AoO. Well I couldn't find anything that implied that, but I did find that "a combatant in melee lets her guard down, and she is not on the defensive as usual." This implies that ANYTIME they let their guard down, they are no longer on the defensive. It doesn't mention that the opponents need to see or perceive her with her guard down. She either is being defensive or not, and she makes that determination by her actions.</p><p></p><p>Then it goes on to say that, "combatants near her can take advantage of her lapse in defense to attack for free." So it seems the only qualifiers are that the opponent has to put their guard down (which THEIR actions determine) and have to be near you for you to make an AoO against them.</p><p></p><p>Now again, to me common sense and even the spirit of the rule would imply you need to perceive someone "taking their guard down." And there are a LOT of spells (and feats for that matter) that break the rules as well. By the strict reading of the rules, you have a valid point. By the spirit of the rules (and the invisibility spell) I still think you need to be aware (as in, see) of the actual action which drops one guard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RigaMortus, post: 691226, member: 1077"] Fair enough. Although I still disagree (until there is an official ruling, hopefully in 3.5 if not sooner) I found some evidence to support your theory. I took a look at Aoo again, looking for anything which would support the theory that you need to perceive what your opponent is doing in order to make an AoO. Well I couldn't find anything that implied that, but I did find that "a combatant in melee lets her guard down, and she is not on the defensive as usual." This implies that ANYTIME they let their guard down, they are no longer on the defensive. It doesn't mention that the opponents need to see or perceive her with her guard down. She either is being defensive or not, and she makes that determination by her actions. Then it goes on to say that, "combatants near her can take advantage of her lapse in defense to attack for free." So it seems the only qualifiers are that the opponent has to put their guard down (which THEIR actions determine) and have to be near you for you to make an AoO against them. Now again, to me common sense and even the spirit of the rule would imply you need to perceive someone "taking their guard down." And there are a LOT of spells (and feats for that matter) that break the rules as well. By the strict reading of the rules, you have a valid point. By the spirit of the rules (and the invisibility spell) I still think you need to be aware (as in, see) of the actual action which drops one guard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does being invis stop AoO?
Top