Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does D&D Next need +2/-2 modifiers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6264117" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>There is, at least currently, no way to simply apply superiority dice as bonus damage.</p><p></p><p>Dirty Trick permits either bonus damage (d6, or d10 from 15th level) or advantage on the next attack, if the die roll equal or exceeds the target's WIS mod.</p><p></p><p>The worst-case for trade-off is if the target has a +6/+10 WIS - in that case, if I roll a 5 (or 9) I get that much damage, whereas the higher roll confers advantage.</p><p></p><p>So is advantage on an attack worth 5 (or 9) bonus damage?</p><p></p><p>Let's compare 1st and 15th level.</p><p></p><p>At 1st level, to hit is (say) +1 for Prof and +3 for Stat, or +4. Damage, let's say, is 1d8+3, or 15/2.</p><p></p><p>So when is advantage worth +5 to damage?</p><p></p><p>The relevant equation can be worked out as follows:</p><p></p><p>At 1st level, the increase damage expectation from attacking with advantage has to equal or exceed 5 damage.</p><p></p><p>For a given AC, chance to miss equals (AC-1-bonus to hit)/20, or at 1st level equals (AC - 5)/20. (The additional -1 is because a roll equal to the AC hits rather than misses.)</p><p></p><p>The chance to hit without advantage therefore equals 1- (AC-5)/20, = (25-AC)/20.</p><p></p><p>The chance to hit with advantage equals 1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400.</p><p></p><p>The additional chance to hit, with advantage, therefore equals 1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400 - (25-AC)/20,</p><p></p><p>= (400 - (AC-5)^2 - 20(25-AC))/400</p><p></p><p>= (400 - AC^2 +10AC -25 -500 + 20AC)/400</p><p></p><p>= (30*AC - AC^2 - 125)/400.</p><p></p><p>For an AC of 13, this gives an extra chance to hit of 0.24. For that to be worth 5 damage, expected damage on a hit would have to be almost 20 and 5/6ths. Conversely, if expected damage on a hit is 15/2, then advantage on the attack is comparable to +1.8 damage.</p><p></p><p>The effective bonus to hit peaks at AC 15 (the derivative of the above equation is (30 - 2*AC)/400, which equals zero when AC = 15). At that rather high AC, the bonus chance to hit = 0.25. At which point advantage on the attack is comparable to +1.875 damage.</p><p></p><p>So at 1st level, Dirty Trick is really not that effective: given that few creatures will have WIS bonuses above +1 or +2, it's analogous to a little bit less than +1 or +2 to damage. I'm not sure I want to say it's a trap choice, but it's not making a huge contribution to damage output.</p><p></p><p></p><p>At 15th level it's no better. Let's say the bonus to hit is now +5 (prof) +5 (stat) +1 (magic), or +11 overall, and damage is 1d8 +5 (stat) +1 (magic), or 21/2.</p><p></p><p>The chance to hit without advantage is now 1- (AC-12)/20, = (32-AC)/20.</p><p></p><p>The chance to hit with advantage equals 1 - ((AC-12)^2)/400.</p><p></p><p>The additional chance to hit, with advantage, therefore equals 1 - ((AC-12)^2)/400 - (32-AC)/20,</p><p></p><p>= (400 - (AC-12)^2 - 20(32-AC))/400</p><p></p><p>= (400 - AC^2 +24AC -144 -640 + 20AC)/400</p><p></p><p>= (44*AC - AC^2 - 384)/400.</p><p></p><p>For an AC of 13, this gives an extra chance to hit of just less than 1/20. That is worth around 0.5 hp of damage. For an AC of 15, it's about 1/8th, hence a bit more than +1 to damage.</p><p></p><p>The effective bonus to hit peaks at AC 22 (the derivative of the above equation is (44 - 2*AC)/400, which equals zero when AC = 22). At that extremely high AC, the bonus chance to hit = 0.25. At which point advantage on the attack is comparable to just over +2.5 to damage.</p><p></p><p>Because the chance to hit actually scales faster than opponent AC, at least in the current playtest, Dirty Trick actually becomes weaker at 15th level, because the 1d10 means you're more likely to get advantage, which is not as strong as +1 or +2 damage from the die. I think that <em>does</em> count as a trap. Maybe [MENTION=66111]Cybit[/MENTION] can comment on whether this has been addressed in more recent versions of the rules.</p><p></p><p>This is a bit mathematically ugly: when is 2 attacks with advantage better than 3 normal attacks? Assuming a 16 DEX for the same to hit chances as the fighter above, we are asking when</p><p></p><p>2*(1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400) >= 3 * (25-AC)/20. (The average damage doesn't matter, as it is constant across the two options, so only expected number of hits counts.)</p><p></p><p>40*(1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400) >= 75-3*AC</p><p></p><p>400 - (AC-5)^2 >= 750-30*AC</p><p></p><p>-400 + (AC-5)^2 <= 30*AC - 750</p><p></p><p>AC^2 - 10*AC + 25 -400 +750 - 30*AC <= 0</p><p></p><p>AC^2 - 40*AC +375 <= 0.</p><p></p><p>(AC-15)(AC-25) <=0</p><p></p><p>So only if AC is 16 or above is advantage on 2 attack actually superior to 3 attacks. (At AC 15 they're equivalent. At AC 14 or below 3 attacks is superior.)</p><p></p><p>This reminds me of Power Attack: what looks like an option but in many cases really isn't one, and hence we have a trap for new players. I think they would be better off rid of it: make a decision about how you want to handle Flurry, and implement that. Alternatively, make it so that you can only spend the point on Supreme Flurry if you've already spent a point on normal flurry.</p><p></p><p>The possibility that a mathematically weak player might make the mistake of thinking that his/her 2nd level option is more powerful than the 1st level one, when for most ACs you'll face at that level it's actually weaker, is to me quite frustrating and a sign of bad design.</p><p></p><p>I haven't done the maths, but the 2nd level option will only get weaker at high levels - just as Dirty Trick gets weaker for the fighter - because the benefits of advantage decrease as the bonus to hit scales faster than AC, whereas an extra attack is a 3/2 damage multiplier. (Until 8th level, at which point it's a 5/4 damage multiplier and the maths has to all be redone. I'll leave that to someone else. And I hope monk players enjoy their quadratic equations!)</p><p></p><p>I don't think that's right. Abjure Enemy imposes the frightened condition, which is an immobilising debuff. And Vow of Enmity grants advantage on attacks for 1 minute, and as far as I can see doesn't require an action to use.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6264117, member: 42582"] There is, at least currently, no way to simply apply superiority dice as bonus damage. Dirty Trick permits either bonus damage (d6, or d10 from 15th level) or advantage on the next attack, if the die roll equal or exceeds the target's WIS mod. The worst-case for trade-off is if the target has a +6/+10 WIS - in that case, if I roll a 5 (or 9) I get that much damage, whereas the higher roll confers advantage. So is advantage on an attack worth 5 (or 9) bonus damage? Let's compare 1st and 15th level. At 1st level, to hit is (say) +1 for Prof and +3 for Stat, or +4. Damage, let's say, is 1d8+3, or 15/2. So when is advantage worth +5 to damage? The relevant equation can be worked out as follows: At 1st level, the increase damage expectation from attacking with advantage has to equal or exceed 5 damage. For a given AC, chance to miss equals (AC-1-bonus to hit)/20, or at 1st level equals (AC - 5)/20. (The additional -1 is because a roll equal to the AC hits rather than misses.) The chance to hit without advantage therefore equals 1- (AC-5)/20, = (25-AC)/20. The chance to hit with advantage equals 1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400. The additional chance to hit, with advantage, therefore equals 1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400 - (25-AC)/20, = (400 - (AC-5)^2 - 20(25-AC))/400 = (400 - AC^2 +10AC -25 -500 + 20AC)/400 = (30*AC - AC^2 - 125)/400. For an AC of 13, this gives an extra chance to hit of 0.24. For that to be worth 5 damage, expected damage on a hit would have to be almost 20 and 5/6ths. Conversely, if expected damage on a hit is 15/2, then advantage on the attack is comparable to +1.8 damage. The effective bonus to hit peaks at AC 15 (the derivative of the above equation is (30 - 2*AC)/400, which equals zero when AC = 15). At that rather high AC, the bonus chance to hit = 0.25. At which point advantage on the attack is comparable to +1.875 damage. So at 1st level, Dirty Trick is really not that effective: given that few creatures will have WIS bonuses above +1 or +2, it's analogous to a little bit less than +1 or +2 to damage. I'm not sure I want to say it's a trap choice, but it's not making a huge contribution to damage output. At 15th level it's no better. Let's say the bonus to hit is now +5 (prof) +5 (stat) +1 (magic), or +11 overall, and damage is 1d8 +5 (stat) +1 (magic), or 21/2. The chance to hit without advantage is now 1- (AC-12)/20, = (32-AC)/20. The chance to hit with advantage equals 1 - ((AC-12)^2)/400. The additional chance to hit, with advantage, therefore equals 1 - ((AC-12)^2)/400 - (32-AC)/20, = (400 - (AC-12)^2 - 20(32-AC))/400 = (400 - AC^2 +24AC -144 -640 + 20AC)/400 = (44*AC - AC^2 - 384)/400. For an AC of 13, this gives an extra chance to hit of just less than 1/20. That is worth around 0.5 hp of damage. For an AC of 15, it's about 1/8th, hence a bit more than +1 to damage. The effective bonus to hit peaks at AC 22 (the derivative of the above equation is (44 - 2*AC)/400, which equals zero when AC = 22). At that extremely high AC, the bonus chance to hit = 0.25. At which point advantage on the attack is comparable to just over +2.5 to damage. Because the chance to hit actually scales faster than opponent AC, at least in the current playtest, Dirty Trick actually becomes weaker at 15th level, because the 1d10 means you're more likely to get advantage, which is not as strong as +1 or +2 damage from the die. I think that [I]does[/I] count as a trap. Maybe [MENTION=66111]Cybit[/MENTION] can comment on whether this has been addressed in more recent versions of the rules. This is a bit mathematically ugly: when is 2 attacks with advantage better than 3 normal attacks? Assuming a 16 DEX for the same to hit chances as the fighter above, we are asking when 2*(1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400) >= 3 * (25-AC)/20. (The average damage doesn't matter, as it is constant across the two options, so only expected number of hits counts.) 40*(1 - ((AC-5)^2)/400) >= 75-3*AC 400 - (AC-5)^2 >= 750-30*AC -400 + (AC-5)^2 <= 30*AC - 750 AC^2 - 10*AC + 25 -400 +750 - 30*AC <= 0 AC^2 - 40*AC +375 <= 0. (AC-15)(AC-25) <=0 So only if AC is 16 or above is advantage on 2 attack actually superior to 3 attacks. (At AC 15 they're equivalent. At AC 14 or below 3 attacks is superior.) This reminds me of Power Attack: what looks like an option but in many cases really isn't one, and hence we have a trap for new players. I think they would be better off rid of it: make a decision about how you want to handle Flurry, and implement that. Alternatively, make it so that you can only spend the point on Supreme Flurry if you've already spent a point on normal flurry. The possibility that a mathematically weak player might make the mistake of thinking that his/her 2nd level option is more powerful than the 1st level one, when for most ACs you'll face at that level it's actually weaker, is to me quite frustrating and a sign of bad design. I haven't done the maths, but the 2nd level option will only get weaker at high levels - just as Dirty Trick gets weaker for the fighter - because the benefits of advantage decrease as the bonus to hit scales faster than AC, whereas an extra attack is a 3/2 damage multiplier. (Until 8th level, at which point it's a 5/4 damage multiplier and the maths has to all be redone. I'll leave that to someone else. And I hope monk players enjoy their quadratic equations!) I don't think that's right. Abjure Enemy imposes the frightened condition, which is an immobilising debuff. And Vow of Enmity grants advantage on attacks for 1 minute, and as far as I can see doesn't require an action to use. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does D&D Next need +2/-2 modifiers?
Top