Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does D&D Next need a Core Setting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keldryn" data-source="post: 5917715" data-attributes="member: 11999"><p>I think that D&D should absolutely have a core setting that is lightly detailed in the DMG and/or PHB. It provides a ready-made context for new players to set their adventures, and also provides an example for DMs who wish to build their own settings.</p><p></p><p>I've been playing and DMing for 25 years, and while I've toyed around with creating my own setting several times, I find that I can't be bothered. I've played in a number of homebrewed worlds, and frankly 99% of them aren't appreciably different from Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms, Mystara, or any other medieval fantasy setting. Different names, different maps, same general feel. It often seems that only the DM really enjoys it while the players wish the DM could just stick with names that they can remember and pronounce.</p><p></p><p>A lightly-detailed setting gives a nice framework for new or busy DMs to get started but still make it their own. Much like the core rules themselves.</p><p></p><p>Having come at it from both angles, it's far easier to ignore some names and default setting information in the core books when using another setting than it is to have to invent that stuff. DMs shouldn't have to buy another book just so that some DMs don't have to ignore a few pages of default setting spread.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The implied setting of 4e (Nentir Vale) was an example of applying the "Points of Light" philosophy of setting design. It was used to create a coherent, default story context in which to place the myriad of monsters and magic that D&D has lifted from a variety of literary and mythological sources.</p><p></p><p>The fact that 4e has this implied setting in no way forced anything upon the Forgotten Realms, Eberron, or Dark Sun. That designers at WotC chose to do so is another matter entirely. The Forgotten Realms has become such an incoherent kitchen-sink fantasy setting that most of the core 4e concepts could have been dropped in as minor elements without another Realms-shattering event. These elements were added to Eberron fairly unintrusively. They took a different approach with Dark Sun; since they were resetting the timeline they did a bit of re-imagining of the setting and used some new core 4e elements where they thought they would fit in. After all, they did more or less cut the whole divine power source from the setting.</p><p></p><p>The Nentir Vale is to 4e what The World of Greyhawk is to AD&D. It's a setting crafted to highlight the D&D game system for which it was designed. It provides a context for adventures and campaigns and shows how game concepts can be integrated with the world. </p><p></p><p>A number of "traditional" D&D game elements have distinct origins in the World of Greyhawk: druids, drow, named spells, artifacts, named magic items, The Great Wheel cosmology, the dual-axis alignment system, and more. They've been a part of the game for so long (and have always been a part of AD&D) that they were generally part of any new settings created for the game.</p><p></p><p>I dislike many things about 4e, but the core setting is one of the things that they absolutely nailed, in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keldryn, post: 5917715, member: 11999"] I think that D&D should absolutely have a core setting that is lightly detailed in the DMG and/or PHB. It provides a ready-made context for new players to set their adventures, and also provides an example for DMs who wish to build their own settings. I've been playing and DMing for 25 years, and while I've toyed around with creating my own setting several times, I find that I can't be bothered. I've played in a number of homebrewed worlds, and frankly 99% of them aren't appreciably different from Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms, Mystara, or any other medieval fantasy setting. Different names, different maps, same general feel. It often seems that only the DM really enjoys it while the players wish the DM could just stick with names that they can remember and pronounce. A lightly-detailed setting gives a nice framework for new or busy DMs to get started but still make it their own. Much like the core rules themselves. Having come at it from both angles, it's far easier to ignore some names and default setting information in the core books when using another setting than it is to have to invent that stuff. DMs shouldn't have to buy another book just so that some DMs don't have to ignore a few pages of default setting spread. The implied setting of 4e (Nentir Vale) was an example of applying the "Points of Light" philosophy of setting design. It was used to create a coherent, default story context in which to place the myriad of monsters and magic that D&D has lifted from a variety of literary and mythological sources. The fact that 4e has this implied setting in no way forced anything upon the Forgotten Realms, Eberron, or Dark Sun. That designers at WotC chose to do so is another matter entirely. The Forgotten Realms has become such an incoherent kitchen-sink fantasy setting that most of the core 4e concepts could have been dropped in as minor elements without another Realms-shattering event. These elements were added to Eberron fairly unintrusively. They took a different approach with Dark Sun; since they were resetting the timeline they did a bit of re-imagining of the setting and used some new core 4e elements where they thought they would fit in. After all, they did more or less cut the whole divine power source from the setting. The Nentir Vale is to 4e what The World of Greyhawk is to AD&D. It's a setting crafted to highlight the D&D game system for which it was designed. It provides a context for adventures and campaigns and shows how game concepts can be integrated with the world. A number of "traditional" D&D game elements have distinct origins in the World of Greyhawk: druids, drow, named spells, artifacts, named magic items, The Great Wheel cosmology, the dual-axis alignment system, and more. They've been a part of the game for so long (and have always been a part of AD&D) that they were generally part of any new settings created for the game. I dislike many things about 4e, but the core setting is one of the things that they absolutely nailed, in my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does D&D Next need a Core Setting?
Top