Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kevin O'Reilly" data-source="post: 468644" data-attributes="member: 8692">In response to the post.Depending on the age group, D+D can help identify abstract boundaries for acceptable morale behaviour and help establish an ethical framework.I play a rogue and steal. Can I still be good? Can I still do good?I play a Wizard and fireballed a group of goblins in a cave that included goblin children and a stolen elf child? Is there any ethical difference? Is it even a morale crime to commit such act in ignorance? Is it an immorale act if I do it again having not thought of the consequences of my actions given an historical outcome of my behaviour?The abstract situations that role-playing creates is an absolute boon to ones ability to objectively address abtract issues of ethical and morale good.In truth, the ability of most on these boards to participate in such a discussion is testiment to that very behaviour the game can instill.Most of the time <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Game on Kant....</blockquote>