Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does DnD encourage racist thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RSKennan" data-source="post: 510768" data-attributes="member: 8256"><p>Just as there is no reason to assume that the "magical handwaving" explaination of imaginary beings interbreeding is true, there is also no reason to assume that they are the same species, genus or have any other biological relationship to one another whatsoever. Either way of explaining it is a matter of personal choice, and the amount of suspension of disbelief the group can handle. In a great many games, (not mine, but many nonetheless) science as we know it doesn't even work, let alone rule the world. A system that operates with parellels to our own concept of physics, biology etc, seems to be in place in these games, with notable exceptions; magic works, allowing for all kinds of gross violations of causality, thermodynamics, and don't get me started. Gunpowder doesn't work. Who cares if you mix saltpeter, sulfur, and charcoal in the perfect proprtions? You get zip. This speaks to the nature of the difference. A fantasy world does not, and some would say, should not model our own reality. </p><p></p><p>Personally I prefer to think that an elf's "biology" is as different from our own biololgy as a virus, with some convergent parellels (similar organs etc). Form follows function. In my games, an elf (or any nonhuman race) will never be simply another type of human, and I and my players like it that way. To me, saying a dwarf is hardy is like saying an eagle has good eyes. Similarly, saying an orc is bloodthirsty is like saying rattlesnakes seek out warmth. A simple fact based upon knowledge of the beast in question. How can that be racist? </p><p></p><p>Parenthetically; I'll say that I too have concerns about the semblance of racism in our hobby. I've had this discussion with close friends, and have even taken the side that the game does have those undertones, but I have come to think that a mere discussion of the differences between people/beings/creatures does not constitute racist thought. Even when those differences are that the (fantasy)"race"/species in question eats humans and is therefore hated by most of said humans. Many humans feel the same way about any predator, be it a wolf or bacterium. Others can see past that and recognise the natural order of things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RSKennan, post: 510768, member: 8256"] Just as there is no reason to assume that the "magical handwaving" explaination of imaginary beings interbreeding is true, there is also no reason to assume that they are the same species, genus or have any other biological relationship to one another whatsoever. Either way of explaining it is a matter of personal choice, and the amount of suspension of disbelief the group can handle. In a great many games, (not mine, but many nonetheless) science as we know it doesn't even work, let alone rule the world. A system that operates with parellels to our own concept of physics, biology etc, seems to be in place in these games, with notable exceptions; magic works, allowing for all kinds of gross violations of causality, thermodynamics, and don't get me started. Gunpowder doesn't work. Who cares if you mix saltpeter, sulfur, and charcoal in the perfect proprtions? You get zip. This speaks to the nature of the difference. A fantasy world does not, and some would say, should not model our own reality. Personally I prefer to think that an elf's "biology" is as different from our own biololgy as a virus, with some convergent parellels (similar organs etc). Form follows function. In my games, an elf (or any nonhuman race) will never be simply another type of human, and I and my players like it that way. To me, saying a dwarf is hardy is like saying an eagle has good eyes. Similarly, saying an orc is bloodthirsty is like saying rattlesnakes seek out warmth. A simple fact based upon knowledge of the beast in question. How can that be racist? Parenthetically; I'll say that I too have concerns about the semblance of racism in our hobby. I've had this discussion with close friends, and have even taken the side that the game does have those undertones, but I have come to think that a mere discussion of the differences between people/beings/creatures does not constitute racist thought. Even when those differences are that the (fantasy)"race"/species in question eats humans and is therefore hated by most of said humans. Many humans feel the same way about any predator, be it a wolf or bacterium. Others can see past that and recognise the natural order of things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does DnD encourage racist thinking?
Top